Discovery II Talk about the Land Rover Discovery II within.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Panhard Bar Conversion w/ Pics!

  #1  
Old 10-21-2014, 08:12 PM
vette427sbc's Avatar
Mudding
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Middletown NJ
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Panhard Bar Conversion w/ Pics!

Been brainstorming for a while (and waiting for some time to open up at the shop) to get this panhard bar conversion going. Coming from a road racing/ auto-x background, I did not want to just put the bar in all *****-nilly (technical term). I wanted to maintain the roll-center that Land Rover designed into the watts link geometry, and also keep minimal lateral axle shift under daily driving suspension movement. Heres what I came up with:
Using the Ruff Stuff Universal trac bar/panhard bar kit with axle offset, outside frame brackets. I modified the Ruff Stuff axle bracket to sit on top of the radius arm bracket. There will be a 1.5" tube welded to the face that will brace it to the axle tube better.
Name:  56C72139-B762-4832-8B63-44476C011CBA_zpskg8grtr2.jpg
Views: 6074
Size:  82.6 KB
Name:  84432076-5242-457B-B5B9-763EA05C894D_zpsghhdm4qk.jpg
Views: 5027
Size:  92.5 KB
Name:  FFE6A8B2-6B60-46CD-AA62-77242594BA1D_zpszoeigcwi.jpg
Views: 3592
Size:  50.9 KB


For the frame mount, I am using the factory watts link drivers side frame bracket. Main reasons being; it was already there and it places the bar in a pretty much ideal height to keep the roll center close to factory, and keep the bar as horizontal as possible. The Ruff Stuff rod ends and spacers measure ~1.9" outside to outside and the factory bushings measure ~1.75" so I had to machine down the spacers a bit to get them to fit.
Name:  1D2AD0BB-9E76-45CE-ACEC-652B86749162_zps3mtmevgi.jpg
Views: 3763
Size:  84.6 KB
Name:  24F9C0EF-4453-4367-B583-02557425AFAF_zpsjq1810tk.jpg
Views: 4088
Size:  105.9 KB

The tube is close to the rear but I cant think of a situation where the axle will articulate and come in contact with it.
Name:  051199F4-FF6C-47CE-ACAC-F72A169B79B9_zpszrv0shvy.jpg
Views: 3442
Size:  70.2 KB

This is where I left off 10 minutes ago... Hopefully tomorrow I can get the axle bracket brace finished up. More pics to come
 
  #2  
Old 10-22-2014, 08:55 AM
ZGPhoto's Avatar
Camel Trophy
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Burlington, VT
Posts: 4,533
Received 102 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

Looks great! I do think that panhard rod will hit your pumpkin when you drop off a large enough bump though. It is nice and flat, I'm interested to hear how it rides, I wish we could compare somehow
 
  #3  
Old 10-22-2014, 09:31 AM
dusty1's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: dallas texas
Posts: 5,794
Received 210 Likes on 194 Posts
Default

does look good, but agreed....unless that is a bad photo angle, you might want to push it back a bit. maybe just a bad look
 
  #4  
Old 10-22-2014, 09:55 AM
adventr's Avatar
Drifting
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Looks good!

I'm going to be doing the same install this coming weekend on my D2. After I priced replacement watts link bushings, it was a no brainer to go with the $175 Ruff Stuff kit.


I don't think you'll have an issue with the track bar contacting your diff housing. As the suspension compresses, that end of the track bar will rise with the axle, so you'd have to REALLY get that axle up there before contact would be an issue.


Question for ya though. I see that you ran the track bar from driver side frame rail, to passenger side axle housing. Basically mimicking the setup that's used on the front axle.
Is there an advantage in doing it that way, versus running it in the opposite direction (passenger side frame rail to driver side axle housing)?

Just curious. I've owned FZJ80 land cruisers in the past, and they run the rear track bar opposite of the front.
However, that may be simply due to the fact that they were primarily designed as RHD vehicles, and in that case, both track bars would be running the same direction.


Maybe I just answered my own questions, but am curious if you have any insight into that.


Looks good!
 
  #5  
Old 10-22-2014, 10:07 AM
ZGPhoto's Avatar
Camel Trophy
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Burlington, VT
Posts: 4,533
Received 102 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by adventr
However, that may be simply due to the fact that they were primarily designed as RHD vehicles, and in that case, both track bars would be running the same direction.
That's a good point, never thought about that but you may be onto something.

However, my panhard is further away from the axle and hits occasionally with a 4" lift.
 
  #6  
Old 10-22-2014, 12:27 PM
vette427sbc's Avatar
Mudding
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Middletown NJ
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thanks Guys! The pic makes it look much closer than it is... Ill get some logs or something to flex it on to make sure nothing hits. But like adventr said, the bar will move up with the axle when the suspension compresses. We shall see what happens though...

As for the left side frame bracket matching the front bar, I coudnt find any conclusive evidence that said not to do it that way. The way I thought about it was if you were going down the highway and hit a dip or rise where the front and rear suspension moved in unison (or close to it), the suspension would shift the car over evenly. If the frame brackets were opposed, the car would go into a "crab walk" shift. I havent done any of the lateral shift calculations with this length bar but I imagine its fairly minimal under daily driving suspension movement. This is all assuming that the front bar is flat at ride height...
 
  #7  
Old 10-22-2014, 12:35 PM
ZGPhoto's Avatar
Camel Trophy
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Burlington, VT
Posts: 4,533
Received 102 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

I'm just glad you did it. I love to see more people doing this mod and getting rid of the watts. You'll really love it.
 
  #8  
Old 10-22-2014, 05:39 PM
vette427sbc's Avatar
Mudding
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Middletown NJ
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

And the final product:
We'll see if it passes the ride home test tonight, hopefully get some stuff to flex on this weekend to check for potential clearance issues.
Name:  DD05ADDD-83C9-4CAE-8575-95C88C901DA4_zpsppo5b2ag.jpg
Views: 4764
Size:  105.6 KB
 
  #9  
Old 10-22-2014, 06:42 PM
adventr's Avatar
Drifting
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Nice! I like the way that you did the brace. Don't be alarmed if I copy that setup when I install mine this weekend...
 
  #10  
Old 10-22-2014, 07:21 PM
vette427sbc's Avatar
Mudding
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Middletown NJ
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Copy away! I do owe some credit for inspiration to Dusty and Zach after seeing their setups though...
I just got back from a little mall crawl. Got to flex the drivers side up as high as I could, figuring this would create the worst case scenario for bar-to-axle contact. All clear with some room to spare! My one concern now is that Im not sure if a watts link splits the lateral load in half on the frame brackets... I would have to think that it does. So now I am putting twice as much load on that original frame bracket than it was designed for. I think next Im going to beef up that bracket just to be on the safe side.
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Panhard Bar Conversion w/ Pics!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:40 AM.