Discovery II Talk about the Land Rover Discovery II within.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Rotoflex vs. U-Joint

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 04-15-2014, 09:13 PM
Fivespddisco's Avatar
Winching
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 628
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul Grant
If you're planning serious off-roading, I would unquestionably go with the conversion. The four bolt flange conversion and a rear prop shaft with u-joints at each end are far more desirable. So you wind up with a u-joint where a rubber coupler once was. You get the inherent strength of the u-joint replacing the softer, more compliant rotoflex. Under use, off-road, it is conceivable that you could tear the rubber coupler. It has happened.

If it's going to be your daily driver with only modest excursions off-road, I would say keep what you have. Replace the rotoflex and forget about it. People like to spend money that they don't have to and over build a truck that was remarkably capable straight from the factory. I'm of the school of thought that would rather keep money on hand for more serious issues, especially if this is your daily driver.
Very well said. I would like to add drive line angle. If your truck is lifted this to will have an effect on the rotoflex. The increased angle of a lifted truck will prematurely wear out the Rotoflex.
 
The following users liked this post:
SouthxSW (10-06-2021)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ColoDisco
Discovery I
48
06-13-2011 12:58 AM
BajaXJ92
Discovery II
6
12-13-2009 09:35 PM
mellyagaunce
Discovery II
5
09-30-2008 10:26 PM
sailorcolin
Discovery II
2
04-14-2008 09:20 PM
willstevens
Discovery II
3
01-02-2008 07:58 AM



Quick Reply: Rotoflex vs. U-Joint



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:42 AM.