Go Back   Land Rover Forums - Land Rover Enthusiast Forum > General Land Rover Forums > General Tech Help
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Welcome to the Land Rover Forums - Land Rover Enthusiast Forum.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Reply
 
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 01-13-2012, 12:11 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 9
Default Gas Mileage Help for a 95 RRC

I have a 95 RRC LWB with a 3" RTE lift and 255/85/55 BF Mudd Terrains and I am getting 10mpg. I wasn't expecting too much better, but is this normal and what are somethings I can do increase it? As of right now the top is bare so no rack or anything.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-14-2012, 06:32 PM
Spike555's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Grand Rapids MI
Posts: 22,871
Philip Lawrence
Send a message via Skype™ to Spike555
Default

You can remove the lift and put on less aggressive tires.
The more wind resistance the lower the MPG, so raise the truck and expose the axles and you reduce MPG.
Aggressive tread also increases rolling resistance which reduces MPG.
__________________

www.marshill.org

Walk by faith not sight.

The "Storm Trooper", 1997 Discovery with 212,000 miles.

www.20liters.org
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-15-2012, 09:55 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spike555 View Post
You can remove the lift and put on less aggressive tires.
The more wind resistance the lower the MPG, so raise the truck and expose the axles and you reduce MPG.
Aggressive tread also increases rolling resistance which reduces MPG.
It would take WAY too long to recoup the costs of lowering the truck. I'm not expecting to get amazing MPG, but I know people with similar lifts, larger tires and racks getting 4 mpg better than me.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-15-2012, 12:19 PM
leadfoot's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by livetoride View Post
I have a 95 RRC LWB with a 3" RTE lift and 255/85/55 BF Mudd Terrains and I am getting 10mpg..
How tall are those tires? The "55" does not make sense. The tire size will impact more than the lift itself.
__________________
Land Rover Discovery 1997 152K
Mitsubishi Montero 1998 140K
Toyota FJ Cruiser 2007 50K
BMW Z3
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-15-2012, 01:24 PM
Savannah Buzz's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Savannah Georgia
Posts: 7,416
Default

Is everything else OK on the truck? As an example, if your thermostat is stuck open, you won't overheat, but MPG will suffer. Same for some sensors.
__________________
RAVE tech manuals available at http://www.landroverresource.com/ (download) or http://macassemble.com/lrm/ (view on line)

D1 GEMS ECU manuals http://landroverforums.com/forum/dis...-manual-47986/

D2 Bosch ECU manuals http://landroverforums.com/forum/dis...manuals-48009/


97 Disco 1 178K "Frankenstien" brought back to life with parts from the dead ones

Shade Tree Mechanic Second Class -
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-15-2012, 03:42 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Fort Sheridan, IL
Posts: 51
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by livetoride View Post
It would take WAY too long to recoup the costs of lowering the truck. I'm not expecting to get amazing MPG, but I know people with similar lifts, larger tires and racks getting 4 mpg better than me.
Some people I've learned on these forums really suck at math. They might not be taking into account odometer error from the tires etc. Also the terrain traveled will have an effect as well.
__________________
"May God have mercy on my enemies as I surely won't" General Patton.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-15-2012, 10:34 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 555
Default

Are you aware that when your Range Rover was brand new, traveling on skinny 205/85/16 tires, the EPA estimate for around town driving was estimated at 12 mpg. Now, 17 years later with significantly larger tires you're surprised with 10mpg?

I owned one of these LWB's back then when it was brand new. I seldom got better than the EPA estimates for around town and highway driving. They were pigs then and they're even worse today.
__________________
paulgrant@mac.com
classicroverparts@gmail.com
http://stores.ebay.com/Classic-Rovers
203-770-1699

Don't try to PM me as I've disabled the feature. Please email me directly or call.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2012, 10:34 PM
 
 
 
Reply

Tags
gas, general, increase, land, lower, mileage, patton, powered, quote, quotes, range, rover, rrc, tires, vbulletin


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
Our Sponsors
 
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 AM.

Copyright © Internet Brands, Inc. All rights reserved.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.
LAND ROVER and its logo are the registered trademarks of Land Rover. Land Rover is not affiliated with LandRoverForums.com.

Emails Backup