![]() |
Colorado Emissions Testing 3-years of Results
I have the records from my last 3 Colorado Emissions Testing The vehicle passed each time:
August 2007: HC GPM: 2.2410 CO GPM: 18.2046 CO2 GPM: 600.7220 NOX GPM: 2.7124 July 2009: HC GPM: 1.0729 CO GPM: 8.6771 CO2 GPM: 566.5227 NOX GPM: 2.0828 July 2011: HC GPM: 0.8026 CO GPM: 6.3390 CO2 GPM: 493.0725 NOX GPM: 1.4023 It is a 1994 Discovery I with just under 140,000 miles, manual transmission. I have worked hard on these vehicle and I am very happy with the results. I would like to compare my results to other Discovery I's that have under gone similar testing. Derek V |
Good thing they don't test for the main product emitted - liquid lubrication, which usually comes out everywhere but the tail pipe....
But you do show the results of good repair practices. My backwards state does not even require testing except in the metro Atlanta area (13 counties out of 159). |
Not only that but I'm sure all the atmospheric variables were different during each testing. Those numbers seem to be dropping as the vehicle gets older. Strange. I would expect the numbers to stay near the same or increase with age.
|
Originally Posted by DerekV
(Post 259997)
I would like to compare my results to other Discovery I's that have under gone similar testing.
Derek V |
I believe I have my last 2 tests. I passed as well with flying colors. I will post them up when I get a chance.
|
"What is it that you're trying to learn?"
I would like to know if it is all the work I have done to the truck that has improved the numbers each time, or are the tests not accurate and I have just gotten lucky. The results of the tests do reflect the work I have done, but without a comparison, I don't have enough data to know for sure. As for oil leaks, I am down to almost none. Derek V Derek V |
Originally Posted by DerekV
(Post 260036)
"What is it that you're trying to learn?"
I would like to know if it is all the work I have done to the truck that has improved the numbers each time, or are the tests not accurate and I have just gotten lucky. The results of the tests do reflect the work I have done, but without a comparison, I don't have enough data to know for sure. As for oil leaks, I am down to almost none. Derek V Derek V |
Looks like I tossed my older ones (a pass is a pass, so I didn't bother keeping). But I have a couple from the PO/OO.
Dec 2004; 91,852 miles HC: .4396 CO: 8.8279 CO2: 837.5925 NOX: 1.2831 Nov 2005; 93,505 miles HC: .4497 CO: 6.9588 CO2: 802.9483 NOX: 1.5435 May 2010; 110,697 miles HC: .1287 CO: 3.9402 CO2: 699.7577 NOX: .6248 Wow, my number got way better between the PO/OO and my last test. Really wish I hadn't tossed the tests in between (I purchased in spring 2006). What's weird is that I haven't done any major changes until this year (new injectors, cap, rotor, wires, plugs, etc.) Maybe the PO/OO did some repairs right before selling it - I have way too many receipts and no desire to dig through them to figure it out (most, if not all the work done under the OO/PO, was done by a mechanic... thus lots of receipts). Not sure if this helps or hurts the analysis. :) |
Wow, I feel sorry for you guys, we dont have emissions testing here.
How much does it cost to get tested each year? I would like to see a comparison to a DII emissions testing though. |
Year dependent - 1982 and newer = $25, 1981 and older = $15.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:40 AM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands