Discovery II Talk about the Land Rover Discovery II within.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Why the worse gas mileage than p38 or DI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-01-2012, 11:55 AM
Rover De Land's Avatar
Mudding
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default Why the worse gas mileage than p38 or DI

Its really nO big deal but I usually got 15-17 in my d1 and you can say its the engine since I now have a 4.6. But my p38 with 4.6 had the best gas mileage. Usually 16-18 it was geared higher.

Just wondering why so bad?
 
  #2  
Old 09-01-2012, 12:07 PM
Rover De Land's Avatar
Mudding
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

I'm getting 12-14 in my stock d2 btw
 
  #3  
Old 09-01-2012, 01:06 PM
Disco Mike's Avatar
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 25,707
Likes: 0
Received 103 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

So bad compared to what, nearly all 4X4's get the same mileage.
I get 14 in town and 18 on the road at 6000 feet.
 
  #4  
Old 09-01-2012, 02:07 PM
Rover De Land's Avatar
Mudding
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Really?? It's in the title...

D1 and p38...

I'm getting nithcably worse gas mileage. I always heard about d2 owners having this gas mileage, I figured it was just the driver.. Even on highway going 65 I'm getting 15mpg
 
  #5  
Old 09-01-2012, 02:08 PM
Rover De Land's Avatar
Mudding
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

My p38 got an easy 20-22 doing 65 a/c off
 
  #6  
Old 09-01-2012, 02:10 PM
909wheeler's Avatar
Mudding
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Park City, Utah
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would guess a combo of weight and bad aerodynamic properties?

I get 12-16. It sucks... literally.
 
  #7  
Old 09-01-2012, 02:56 PM
Rover De Land's Avatar
Mudding
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 909wheeler
I would guess a combo of weight and bad aerodynamic properties?

I get 12-16. It sucks... literally.
True and p38 was more aero and geared higher.. But it's nearly identical to a d1. Just something I wanted to talk about. Any guesses?
 
  #8  
Old 09-01-2012, 03:25 PM
Bkreutz's Avatar
Winching
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Shoreline, WA
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

That year P38 and DI's both have GEMS engine management systems, DII's have a Bosch management system. Seems to me that the "cleaner" they make engines the worse the fuel mileage gets. I have no hard data but it sure seemed that way on the succession of Ford pickups I've had over the years, the engines got smaller, the engine management got newer and the mileage got worse (I don't have an Ecoboost, I stopped liking the Ford styling about 2003 and haven't had one since I got rid of mine in 2010)
 
  #9  
Old 09-01-2012, 05:49 PM
lr2001silver's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,533
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Gears and weight along with the bosch system. You could change your gears it would bring it up bit.
 
  #10  
Old 09-01-2012, 05:51 PM
Rover De Land's Avatar
Mudding
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

I thought it was geared same as d1

I had a big post about how omg what the ford f-150 blows the Chevy and dodhe out of the water and how old models sucked.. Dunno what happened but yea I agree on possibly emmisions
 


Quick Reply: Why the worse gas mileage than p38 or DI



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 AM.