Long range comfort: let's talk suspension options
#21
Are FJ80 springs knowns to be taller than LR ones? I ask because it seems stock fronts are 160in/lbs which according to my math are perfect for the extra ~340lbs of diesel motor.
Last edited by kingsly; 03-03-2015 at 05:21 PM.
#22
you can watch me going over some rocks on u tube, little bit taller might be nice
#23
Thanks! Already got a few of those open in tabs actually. Will read up and probably come back with more q's.
Are FJ80 springs knowns to be taller than LR ones? I ask because it seems stock fronts are 160in/lbs which according to my math are perfect for the extra ~340lbs of diesel motor.
Are FJ80 springs knowns to be taller than LR ones? I ask because it seems stock fronts are 160in/lbs which according to my math are perfect for the extra ~340lbs of diesel motor.
Take your stock front spring and calculate its compressed length assuming 880lb per tire.
(uncompressed length)-(weight)/(rate) = compressed spring length
16.54 - 880 / 133 = 9.92"
Now take a spring you're considering. Let's say an OME 2851 and let's add 100lbs to the front axle (50lb per front spring).
18.8976 - 930 / 220 = 14.67"
14.67" - 9.92" = 4.75"
In this case we'd gain 4.75" lift in the front even with 100lb extra weight on the front axle. This may or may not be desirable. Calculations work the same for the rear where I usually assume 1320lbs stock unladen weight per spring.
Remember to factor in not just the weight of your engine, but any other additions as well like bumpers, winch, sliders, bigger rear tire, ladder, roof rack, extreme obesity, etc and estimate what portion of the weight sits on which axle.
Last edited by EricTyrrell; 03-04-2015 at 01:15 PM.
The following users liked this post:
kingsly (03-04-2015)
#24
#25
Thanks for all that info! Definitely helps demystify the whole spring/length/weight/rate question.
So, hypothetically, if I wanted a 420lb increase (diesel + 100# provisions for armor) on the front axle with factory ride comfort and 2" lift I'd be looking for a spring:
~19" tall with a 165 lb/in rate
Right? Of course I'll ultimately have to take some other factors into account like the weight of all the fluids, extra batteries, etc. as well as a slight bump in rate to help compensate for higher CG. But I really want to keep the ride comfort (and resulting increase in ground contact pressure) as close to stock as possible.
So, hypothetically, if I wanted a 420lb increase (diesel + 100# provisions for armor) on the front axle with factory ride comfort and 2" lift I'd be looking for a spring:
~19" tall with a 165 lb/in rate
Right? Of course I'll ultimately have to take some other factors into account like the weight of all the fluids, extra batteries, etc. as well as a slight bump in rate to help compensate for higher CG. But I really want to keep the ride comfort (and resulting increase in ground contact pressure) as close to stock as possible.
#27
#28
The stock suspension geometry performance goes downhill steeply after 2 inches lift so I'd caution you going for 3, unless you planned on being at 2 while laden with gear. Of course 3 and more has been done many times, but results vary and can require costly investments like DC drive shafts, drilled swivel *****, castor corrected radius arms, corrected rear arms, extended shocks, extended bump stops, etc all for diminishing returns. It's possible to run up to 33s on 2" lift and trimming anyways. Big tires decrease acceleration and crawling ability, and increase risk of breaking diffs and axles, so often HD axles, custom gears, and locking/ATB/LSD diffs are used at considerable cost. Hard core offroaders go big, pay for it, and for them it's worth it. Overlanders tend to go more conservative on the tire size and lift since in reality even a stock truck is highly capable.
Last edited by EricTyrrell; 03-04-2015 at 03:29 PM.
#30
Exactly.
The stock suspension geometry performance goes downhill steeply after 2 inches lift so I'd caution you going for 3, unless you planned on being at 2 while laden with gear. Of course 3 and more has been done many times, but results vary and can require costly investments like DC drive shafts, drilled swivel *****, castor corrected radius arms, corrected rear arms, extended shocks, extended bump stops, etc all for diminishing returns. It's possible to run up to 33s on 2" lift and trimming anyways. Big tires decrease acceleration and crawling ability, and increase risk of breaking diffs and axles, so often HD axles, custom gears, and locking/ATB/LSD diffs are used at considerable cost. Hard core offroaders go big, pay for it, and for them it's worth it. Overlanders tend to go more conservative on the tire size and lift since in reality even a stock truck is highly capable.
The stock suspension geometry performance goes downhill steeply after 2 inches lift so I'd caution you going for 3, unless you planned on being at 2 while laden with gear. Of course 3 and more has been done many times, but results vary and can require costly investments like DC drive shafts, drilled swivel *****, castor corrected radius arms, corrected rear arms, extended shocks, extended bump stops, etc all for diminishing returns. It's possible to run up to 33s on 2" lift and trimming anyways. Big tires decrease acceleration and crawling ability, and increase risk of breaking diffs and axles, so often HD axles, custom gears, and locking/ATB/LSD diffs are used at considerable cost. Hard core offroaders go big, pay for it, and for them it's worth it. Overlanders tend to go more conservative on the tire size and lift since in reality even a stock truck is highly capable.
Currently running 235/85's and am not interested in going any taller than that. If anything a little shorter but widen the stance out a tad. 2" might be the ticket then - how much trimming are we talking about?