Discovery I Talk about the Land Rover Discovery Series I within.

Oxygen Sensor / Cats Fun Facts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 12-16-2010 | 10:01 AM
Rover Chris's Avatar
Recovery Vehicle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 9
From: Chandler,AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Rover Chris
now you have sparked my curiosity I would think a warn out CC would get hotter faster but it would be because there is less catalyst plating on it (kind of like boiling a cup of water versus 5 gallons of water), so with that said a newer catalytic converter would take longer to work but would work more efficiently than an older one. And of course your right about the other factors, like fuel octane, spark plug condition/gap, and probably carbon build up on the cylinders, valves and exhaust manifold.

So I wonder what the rate of break down vs. efficiency would be on a CC? like do they only work half as good after a few months or are they almost as good as new right up until they throw a CEL? and with that said would a well broken in one actually be more efficient than a new one? my guess is that since they are not supposed to sell used CC's that they just start degrading from day 1
on second thought I drive a rover so I obviously don't care too much about how efficient my CC is!
 
  #12  
Old 12-16-2010 | 10:04 AM
Cosmic88's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Winching
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 598
Likes: 12
From: Swampy Sandbar, USA
Default Right!

too funny... hell, I don't even have any cats... or a resonator. Just one lonely center muffler
 
  #13  
Old 12-16-2010 | 01:07 PM
okdiscoguy's Avatar
Camel Trophy
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,959
Likes: 11
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

All I am saying is that all 4 have a purpose in engine management.

I agree that RAW fuel kills cats. I had an bad injector which lead to the cat destruction. proper atomization and still burning fuel post combustion is what heats up the cats.

And whoever said I was wrong - I was using a basic statement. The compounds react to oxidation, which is based on temperature, so in very basic term, they measure temperature. That is what I meant..

Again, though... my whole point is that the post cat O2's have a function other than turning on a light...
 
  #14  
Old 12-16-2010 | 01:35 PM
Chris-bob's Avatar
TReK
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,073
Likes: 6
From: Ketchikan, Alaska, USA
Default

Originally Posted by Cosmic88
Raw fuel kills CATS... is that in dispute?
I must disagree with this statement. My brother-in-law dumped a gallon of raw fuel on a cat and it did not die. It did, however, lose all it's hair...
 
  #15  
Old 12-16-2010 | 01:54 PM
antisoshal's Avatar
4wd Low
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by okdiscoguy
And whoever said I was wrong - I was using a basic statement. The compounds react to oxidation, which is based on temperature, so in very basic term, they measure temperature. That is what I meant..
Not trying to be a dick, but that's still wrong. O2 sensors detect a difference in oxygen between two samples. The catalyst that performs this works better at a certain temperature range, but ideally the o2 sensor would be HELD at that temp to give better readings. Any temperature correlation is ideally factored out of the sensor. There isn't any correlation between the exhaust temperature and the detected difference as long as the probe is operating in its desired range. Its possible you could use an o2 sensor as a thermometer if you really wanted to extrapolate all the variables and create the proper look up tables and do the math, but that doesn't mean it is simply a high temperature thermometer. Thermometers measure absolute temperature. O2 sensors measure the difference in oxygen content between two samples.
 
  #16  
Old 12-16-2010 | 05:31 PM
Rover Chris's Avatar
Recovery Vehicle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 9
From: Chandler,AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Chris-bob
I must disagree with this statement. My brother-in-law dumped a gallon of raw fuel on a cat and it did not die. It did, however, lose all it's hair...
LOL thats awesome!
 
  #17  
Old 12-16-2010 | 07:00 PM
ngarover's Avatar
Winching
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 683
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by Chris-bob
I must disagree with this statement. My brother-in-law dumped a gallon of raw fuel on a cat and it did not die. It did, however, lose all it's hair...
Bee dump dump clank.
 
  #18  
Old 12-16-2010 | 07:19 PM
Cosmic88's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Winching
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 598
Likes: 12
From: Swampy Sandbar, USA
Default Moby Dick

Originally Posted by ngarover
Bee dump dump clank.
John Bonham you are not...
 
  #19  
Old 12-16-2010 | 07:46 PM
Spike555's Avatar
Team Owner
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,212
Likes: 95
From: Grand Rapids MI
Default

This is a good read, wish I had gotten home from work sooner...good work Cosmic.

As for O2's reading O2 levels, this is why our trucks throw a O2 code when the spark plugs start to wear out or you have mis fires, a incomplete combustion sends more raw fuel downstream and the O2's go out of wack and BAM!, check engine light with a O2 code.

I saw a episode of "Deconstructed" on the Discovery? Channel, they took a catalytic converter apart and they said it takes 5-6 miles of driving for one to reach full operating efficiency.

I would tend to think that cat's die quicker with frequent short trips, but thats just my opinion.

As for the engine running rich when cold (cold engines need more fuel [think full choke] and the cats need raw fuel to reach temp) last winter I did a experiment.
I kept track of my MPG for one week, I let the truck warm up for 10 min before leaving for work and 10 min before heading home.
Did this for 5 days.
Then the next week I did not let the truck warm up, I just drove it gently until fully warm, again both to work and home from work.
I drove the exact same route, used the same fuel, no deviation for the two weeks.
Warm up MPG ~15.
Non warm up MPG ~10.

As for the post cat O2's, how do you think they did it before 4 O2's were required?
Do all pre-OBDII cars run rich all the time?
I have done the research, post cat O2's do nothing for engine fueling.
I too used to believe that you needed all 4 O2's and that O2's were nothing more than thermometers...I was wrong.

This is very good Cosmic, keep it up.
 
  #20  
Old 12-16-2010 | 09:46 PM
geek_IM's Avatar
Rock Crawling
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 323
Likes: 10
Default

Originally Posted by Rover Chris
So I wonder what the rate of break down vs. efficiency would be on a CC? like do they only work half as good after a few months or are they almost as good as new right up until they throw a CEL? and with that said would a well broken in one actually be more efficient than a new one? my guess is that since they are not supposed to sell used CC's that they just start degrading from day 1
You are correct, they basically work by providing a nice home for a reaction to take place and use a honeycomb structure meant to maximize the surface area available. Their performance profile follows a nearly linear dropoff as surface area is lost over the life of the converter.
 


Quick Reply: Oxygen Sensor / Cats Fun Facts



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:06 AM.