Discovery II Talk about the Land Rover Discovery II within.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Is it normal for the front brakes to wear faster than the rears?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-19-2009 | 08:37 PM
lipadj46's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
TReK
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,106
Likes: 8
Default Is it normal for the front brakes to wear faster than the rears?

I will preface this by saying that I have the 3 amigos on. No sure what the codes are as I have not got them read yet (I'm having problems with handing over $100 just to have a kid hook my truck up to a computer for 5 seconds).

So anyhow I just inspected all 4 brakes while bleeding the brake fluid. The front pads and rotors are much more worn than the rears. I know the front brakes have more stopping power so maybe its normal but this is the first time I've really dealt with worn brakes so I figure I would ask.

I figure I could have a bad shuttle valve too and that could cause the uneven wear.
 
  #2  
Old 07-19-2009 | 09:00 PM
Spike555's Avatar
Team Owner
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,212
Likes: 95
From: Grand Rapids MI
Default

No, they should wear fairly evenly.
Unless you do alot of hard braking anyway.
 
  #3  
Old 07-19-2009 | 09:34 PM
lipadj46's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
TReK
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,106
Likes: 8
Default

Well the truck was a NYC commuter for a couple years so yeah there was a lot of stop and go stuff and hard braking. I'm thinking I'm going to have to break down and get my ABS codes read, though ABS is overrated.
 
  #4  
Old 07-19-2009 | 10:03 PM
Spike555's Avatar
Team Owner
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,212
Likes: 95
From: Grand Rapids MI
Default

Yes ABS is very over rated, thats one of the reasons I pulled my ABS fuse, you can do that though.
 
  #5  
Old 07-19-2009 | 11:18 PM
LRScott's Avatar
Pro Wrench
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,706
Likes: 3
From: Meridian, Idaho
Default

On some of my other cars the brakes will wear faster in the front than rear. I belive on average most cars use 70% braking power in the front and 30% in the rear. When you think about it, that is the best way to brake. Some of my other cars have an emergency brake that just engages the rear brakes. If it is locked up in snow the whole back end will break loose. So it is smarter to have most of the stopping power in the front anyways. I would imagine that rovers are fairly even on the braking distribution like Spike said because of the 4wd and traction systems. I haven't had my rover long enough to confirm if mine wear even or wear more on the front, so for rovers I really don't know yet.
 
  #6  
Old 07-20-2009 | 07:09 AM
Disco Mike's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 25,707
Likes: 106
From: Denver, Colorado
Default

Front brakes alway wear faster in the front then the rear, about 1.5 sets of pads in the front to 1 set in the rear.
 
  #7  
Old 07-20-2009 | 07:14 AM
lipadj46's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
TReK
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,106
Likes: 8
Default

Well that looks about right then.
 
  #8  
Old 07-20-2009 | 08:26 PM
SFlynn2nd's Avatar
Drifting
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: SCS Michigan
Default

I've found on none LR vehicles that about 60-70 % of the braking is done up front...
Regards
 
  #9  
Old 07-20-2009 | 11:48 PM
Camdisco24's Avatar
TReK
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,172
Likes: 8
From: Asheville, NC
Default

Just look at the amount of brake dust the front brakes makes compared to the back, big difference. I roll up to stop lights and light brake as much as possible and I still clean my wheels every few weeks from the dust. (because it bugs me)
 
  #10  
Old 07-21-2009 | 12:44 AM
LRScott's Avatar
Pro Wrench
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,706
Likes: 3
From: Meridian, Idaho
Default

I still clean my wheels every few weeks from the dust. (because it bugs me)
Same here
 


Quick Reply: Is it normal for the front brakes to wear faster than the rears?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:24 AM.