LR3 Talk about the Land Rover LR3 within.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LR3 Lower Control Arm Replacement Part Numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 7, 2024 | 03:08 PM
  #1  
Terrapin's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Jan 2024
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default LR3 Lower Control Arm Replacement Part Numbers

I am interested in replacing the lower control arms on my LR3. After much investigation, I decided to use OEM lower control arms. I found a recommendation to utilize Range Rover Sport lower control arms instead of the LR3 lower control arms. Apparently, the Range Rover Sport lower control arms are more robust and are utilized in armored Land Rover/Range Rover military vehicles. Can anyone confirm this is a viable drop in replacement option to improve the lower control arm on a 2007 LR3?

Below, the LR3 control arm part numbers are defined with the Range Rover Sport suggested replacement:
LR 075993 A Control Arm – Right Front Lower - LR 029304 (Range Rover Sport P/N)
LR 075995 A Control Arm – Left Front Lower – LR 029306 (Range Rover Sport P/N)

I appreciate feedback in regard to this recommendation. Thank you,
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2024 | 06:32 PM
  #2  
DakotaTravler's Avatar
Camel Trophy
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 4,964
Likes: 950
From: Green Bay, WI
Default

They are not more robust per say, they are just stuffer and thus you will have slightly more feedback into the frame. They do not last longer than the originals.
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2024 | 07:41 PM
  #3  
houm_wa's Avatar
Camel Trophy
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 482
From: North of Seattle
Default

^^ This....also, I don't think the RRS control arms are the same that are used in the armored version Land Rovers. I believe that is a different p/n altogether. To add one more consideration, stiffer bushings are not more ideal for off-roading.
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2024 | 08:12 AM
  #4  
kajtzu's Avatar
Rock Crawling
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 313
Likes: 83
From: Helsinki
Default

RBJ501000 AND RBJ501010 (armored’s LCA) do supersede to part numbers that are shared by RRS1. You can check it yourself at https://parts.jaguarlandroverclassic.com/ if you want.
The arms are the same, the bushes are different compared to regular D3.
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2024 | 08:19 AM
  #5  
kajtzu's Avatar
Rock Crawling
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 313
Likes: 83
From: Helsinki
Default

Also the original LCAs probably have a 32 mm ball joint while the “new” (updated) ones will/should have a 35 mm ball joint. The parts fitting the 35 mm ball joint have it in their description.

(Answer to the “drop in replacement” question would be “it depends” which is a great engineering answer in general)
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2024 | 01:10 PM
  #6  
Terrapin's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Jan 2024
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks for all of the replies. kajtzu, I appreciate your investigation confirming the RRS lower control arm part number is the same (except for the ball joint diameter concern) as the armored lower control arm part number.
It seems the lower control arms are a bit of a weak link in the LR3 and I'm just looking for an improved OEM version. However, it seems there are other details such as ball joint diameter and mating connecting rods that must be taken into consideration when going the RRS/armored p/n direction. Given the nuances, and the fact I don't want to be shipping parts back to suppliers (making the shipping companies even richer), I may just stick with the LR3 lower control arm part numbers.
I just noticed the LR3 LCA is priced $53.00 more than the RRS LCA on the Atlantic British site.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KrazyR
LR2
0
Aug 9, 2023 01:49 AM
ljdiscovery
LR3
2
Feb 5, 2019 11:10 AM
RickyN29
LR3
1
Jun 13, 2018 11:54 AM
demelvin
Suspension sponsored by Arnott Inc.
0
Jul 30, 2008 10:24 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:55 PM.