4x6
Kinda.
Mainly I'm thinking, what a waste of money and waste of a Land Rover.
Also, 4x6 is lumber, not a vehicle description.
Number of wheel positions is first, number of positions that drive is second. So it's 6x4.
Except it isn't that either, since all wheels are drive wheels.
It's actually a 6x6.
The Sandtrekker Land Rover was originally 6x4, in its first incarnation. It had really poor performance off-road.
Mainly I'm thinking, what a waste of money and waste of a Land Rover.
Also, 4x6 is lumber, not a vehicle description.
Number of wheel positions is first, number of positions that drive is second. So it's 6x4.
Except it isn't that either, since all wheels are drive wheels.
It's actually a 6x6.
The Sandtrekker Land Rover was originally 6x4, in its first incarnation. It had really poor performance off-road.
Kahn Design says they built it to rival the Brabus G63 6x6. They got a long way to go. Portal axles, Lifted, Onboard in-cab tire pressure adjustment and an interior that doesnt look like it came out of fast and furious 1.
And lets not forget the power difference.
And lets not forget the power difference.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



