Welcome to the Land Rover Forums - Land Rover Enthusiast Forum.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Hello all,
I am looking into buying an older range rover 1990-1998 to use as an off-road toy. My question is there a preference in years. How are the axles would they hold up too 33" all terrain tires, I also see that a lot of these have electrical issues does anyone no what the common electrical issues are and or solutions. Thanks for any direction.
First of all, I would hazard a guess that just about any 20-22 year old vehicle is going to have more than its fair share of issues, electrical or otherwise. As long as the problems aren't behind the dash where the Range Rover excels in complicating matters, it's really not going to be much worse than any other luxury vehicle of a similar age.
Second, the Range Rover, through mid year 1993 had ten spline diffs and axles. While not a guarantee for failure the 33" tires, they will put added stress on the mechanicals.
Upgrading to 24 spline diffs and axles isn't that expensive but it might be easier to start out with a '94 or '95 Range Rover so you don't have to go through the trouble. In doing so, you also get nice additions like traction control on the rear axles.
Third, I would suggest that the biggest concern for anyone living in the rust belt as you do, is rot. More than 10 spline, 24 spline, ABS, non ABS, traction control, SWB, LWB or any of the other variations, the principle issue you have to deal with is finding as rust free an example as you can. Starting there, the rest can be dealt with over time. Starting with a rust bucket, you're constantly behind the eight ball desperately trying to get ahead of the curve.
You should consider wheel base as well. The RR classic (non LWB) had a shorter wheel base than any other RR until maybe the recent RR Evoque. You can get classics and P38s on the cheap, so I would recommend getting to know both model years and then deciding upon which one you like the most. The classics tend to be more straight forward in their operation, but the P38s tend to be less buggy IMO.
__________________
A Land Rover doesn't leak! It marks its territory.
What do Jaguars and possums have in common? Both play dead at home and get killed on the road.
1996 Range Rover 4.0SE 167k Miles
1998 Jaguar XJ8 107k Miles
2003 Land Rover Discovery 114k Miles
2005 Jaguar XJR 52k Miles
I like the Classic as well but it seems most on the the market are the Lwb version.
The Becm on the P38s makes me little nervous. Is there a way to bypass the Becm?
find yourself a 94 or 95 classic swb like paul said. the p38 will have you banging ur head into a wall.
I agree 100% about the P38 and head banging.
I sold a Disco I that was a great off road toy, I have found another one that needs a transfer case and when I get my honey do list done will fix it.
I THINK the Disco is a little more robust than the P38 but that is just my $.02
__________________
Take Care
George Pavlisko
Aiken S.C. or Orange Park Fl.
Some of the STUFF
Rovers
1998 D1 50th MJ
1996 D1 (stray) (Got parts)
2001 Range Rover 4.6 HSE ALIVE AND WELL with a new Heart
2005 LS3 SE (wife) Her CAR not my wife.
1978 Rolls Shadow II (will restore)
1971 "E" type Jag 2+2 V12
1984 Porsche 928
1937 Chevrolet Modified
2003 50th Anniv Corvette
1992 S10 Blazer Sport 78,000 original miles.
opinions wanted please.
