v8 HP REDUCTION
#1
v8 HP REDUCTION
It appears that LR is reducing the HP in the V8 . They originally stated power of 525 and 518 HP, now i see that both models are reduced to 518 and 493 respectively. Acceleration has remained the same.
Does anyone know what is going on? I just ordered a P525 and wonder if it will now be a P518???
Does anyone know what is going on? I just ordered a P525 and wonder if it will now be a P518???
#2
#3
The following 2 users liked this post by lrFFM:
cc1999 (08-08-2024),
NativeTexan (02-08-2024)
#4
The Rover V8 engine is a compact V8internal combustion engine with aluminiumcylinder block and cylinder heads, originally designed by General Motors and later re-designed and produced by Rover in the United Kingdom.[2] It has been used in a wide range of vehicles from Rover and other manufacturers since its British debut in 1967.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buick_V8_engine#215
This video helps explain as well:
#6
Originally Posted by 90V8
I thought it was a Ford design as well - turns out it is an old GM design from the 1950's:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rover_V8_engine
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buick_V8_engine#215
This video helps explain as well:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buick_V8_engine#215
This video helps explain as well:
Better question is why we don't have the 592hp version in the Defender V8.
#7
The AJV8 design is based off the Rover V8, JLR made it in house like you said, but it's still based off an old GM design. They were under Ford ownership when they made the AJV8 but Ford had nothing to do with the actual design.
#10
It has nothing to do with the GM engine. Jaguar literally did a single cylinder study for use in 4,6,8 and 12 cylinder configurations. As I said do a little reading below.
http://www.jagweb.com/aj6eng/v8_performance.php
https://www.jaguarheritage.com/jagua...g/ajv8-engine/
https://www.aronline.co.uk/engines/e...-jaguar-aj-v8/
"During the BL days there had been some discussion of using the Buick-derived Rover V8, which had substantial advantages in terms of weight (in fact it weighed half as much as the V12), cost and size. Unfortunately, most of the advantage came from the fact that it was relatively thin walled and so suffered in refinement a little. But in reality this could have been developed out, as was the case in the final fling of the Rover V8 inside the P38a Range Rovers.
However, that venerable V8 was itself a relic of the 1960s and ultimately suffered from the same issues as the old Jaguar engines, in terms of efficiency and emissions. It also struggled to meet the power demands of modern cars, the 4.6-litre version only putting out 220bhp."
http://www.jagweb.com/aj6eng/v8_performance.php
https://www.jaguarheritage.com/jagua...g/ajv8-engine/
https://www.aronline.co.uk/engines/e...-jaguar-aj-v8/
"During the BL days there had been some discussion of using the Buick-derived Rover V8, which had substantial advantages in terms of weight (in fact it weighed half as much as the V12), cost and size. Unfortunately, most of the advantage came from the fact that it was relatively thin walled and so suffered in refinement a little. But in reality this could have been developed out, as was the case in the final fling of the Rover V8 inside the P38a Range Rovers.
However, that venerable V8 was itself a relic of the 1960s and ultimately suffered from the same issues as the old Jaguar engines, in terms of efficiency and emissions. It also struggled to meet the power demands of modern cars, the 4.6-litre version only putting out 220bhp."
The following users liked this post:
Elektrapops (02-08-2024)