MAF clean fixed cold hesitation (I think)
Gonna try this tomorrow. Cleaned the throttle body a while back but wasn't aware of the MAF, or the problems it could potentially cause.
Thanks for the info, I'm here to learn!
Edit: Found this tidbit of wisdom from Disco Mike whilst researching the subject:
Is this true? Or does it only apply if done improperly? (Engine warm, WD-40 instead of the aforementioned CRC/MAF cleaner, etc.)
Thanks for the info, I'm here to learn!
Edit: Found this tidbit of wisdom from Disco Mike whilst researching the subject:
As for the MAF, clean it and loose it, they fail when being cleaned so leave it along.[sic]
Last edited by Michael M. Koch; Feb 2, 2013 at 07:19 PM.
The reason the MAFs fail when cleaned is that some fool (aka DIY Doofus) has switched on the ignition, either turned up the radio to rock the garage, or backed the truck out into the driveway. As soon as the key was turned to position 2 very small parts inside the MAF were heated to about 350F above ambient temperature. Spray that with aerosol and the cooling effect of the reduced pressue spray makes such a big difference in temps that those small parts can fracture. Like heating up a plain glass jar in an oven, then filling it with ice water. The MAF for a D1 costs like $1400. I have cleaned mine several times. If you do this when it has sat overnight, and don't put key in ignition, then you should be OK. Let it drip dry before turning on key in truck.
WD 40 is not a good MAF cleaner, or a throttle butterfly valve cleaner (use carb cleaner). WD40 is good to lube linkage, etc.
WD 40 is not a good MAF cleaner, or a throttle butterfly valve cleaner (use carb cleaner). WD40 is good to lube linkage, etc.
In my Volkswagen days it was very common to pull the mad and soak it in a baggy if isopropyl alcohol for ten to fifteen minutes then air dry before reinstallation. I wonder if this technic would hurt the rover maf?
Glad the MAF cleaning solved your issue, always nice when its something simple.
I'm just wondering though, do the MAFs used in the 94&95 discos respond to cleaning as well as the GEMS ones? Maybe a stupid question, but I thought I would ask anyway.
I'm just wondering though, do the MAFs used in the 94&95 discos respond to cleaning as well as the GEMS ones? Maybe a stupid question, but I thought I would ask anyway.
Can't hurt. It still operates on the same principle I assume?
All MAF systems work the same. They heat up an element, usually a wire, and measure the amount of current needed to maintain the temperature.
I have seen some older systems that used a seimconductior chip instead of the wire, but the semicondutor was short lived.
I have seen some older systems that used a seimconductior chip instead of the wire, but the semicondutor was short lived.



