Another Rover Performance Thread
The Range Rover (L322) in Europe came stock with the BMW M57 Turbo Diesel (TD6)
US based BMW M57 engines can easily have 300hp, 600ftlb tq, 8spd transmissions, and get 30-35mpg in their vehicles. No noise, no vibration, no stink...just crazy power, great reliability, and great gas mileage for large heavy vehicles. Sounds like a perfect fit for our beasts to me. The parts are comparable or cheaper than LS swap parts, and companies in Europe can provide all that's needed computer and wiring wise to make the swap even easier than an LS, from what I understand.
Seems like a good idea, on paper anyway?
US based BMW M57 engines can easily have 300hp, 600ftlb tq, 8spd transmissions, and get 30-35mpg in their vehicles. No noise, no vibration, no stink...just crazy power, great reliability, and great gas mileage for large heavy vehicles. Sounds like a perfect fit for our beasts to me. The parts are comparable or cheaper than LS swap parts, and companies in Europe can provide all that's needed computer and wiring wise to make the swap even easier than an LS, from what I understand.
Seems like a good idea, on paper anyway?

Don't even need new drive shafts...from what this lil video shows...unless I missed or misunderstood something?
Just listen to that thing accelerate and go thru the gears near the end of the video (16:00 mark or so)
Just listen to that thing accelerate and go thru the gears near the end of the video (16:00 mark or so)

Last edited by RA122125; May 11, 2024 at 05:09 PM.
Will look into that. I understand 3800 can be built up to some very impressive horsepower. I read an article about a guy who made a 650 horsepower
motor (heavily modified/high octane) by ditching the Supercharger and using a Turbocharger instead. That of course is way too much power than I want but I could get 350 to 400 horses. from a build
As always I'll look into it but, then I'll probably decide against it due to high cost nevertheless its worth some researching. The RWD engines could be had on eBay relatively cheap and ready for rebuild in the event it were to happen
Thanks
motor (heavily modified/high octane) by ditching the Supercharger and using a Turbocharger instead. That of course is way too much power than I want but I could get 350 to 400 horses. from a build
As always I'll look into it but, then I'll probably decide against it due to high cost nevertheless its worth some researching. The RWD engines could be had on eBay relatively cheap and ready for rebuild in the event it were to happen
Thanks
a trans controller is a grand or run an gen 4 LS ECU with the trans controller built in. I'd argue that the trans set up is far far below 7-10k to run a 6l90. Plus the benefit of the gearing is you can achieve very low gearing if leveraging the t-case and diff ratios correctly in low range.
4:88 gears on 33s pairs with the low 1st gear of the 6l80 would be very impressive off road. Even more impressive if you adapt that 6l80 to a torqy diesel
Fitment isn't as nice in older rovers. Roadside just put one in a defender and I believe they had some challenges and a defender bay/trans tunnel is far friendlier to swaps than a disco. That said if not going LS that might be the next best option. Prices will keep this from happening but a 3.0 Duramax from a newer 1500 or tahoe would be very very interesting to see in a rover imo.
It is a wide engine compared to the 2.8 Duramax so I fear fitment might be an issue in the small D2 engine bay
Horsepower is what you need for race cars running at high RPM's and high speeds around a track....Torque is what you need to move heavy objects from a standstill and up hills. Don't let folks twist ya around thinking HP is good for heavy slower moving vehicles...it's a waste of money and time, as taught repetitively by those who've built trail rigs, rock crawlers and rock bouncers for years. Use the right tool for the job...just sayin
It doesn't take much to outperform the 230 some odd ft-lbs of torque the stock 4.0 makes. A stock 3800 makes 215 ft lbs before any mods.
While not the engine I'd choose, or would probably run circles around around any 4.0/4.6 disco at even the 300 hp range.
I'd go with a 4.3 before a 3800. V8 mpg with 6 cylinder power, in stock form.
While not the engine I'd choose, or would probably run circles around around any 4.0/4.6 disco at even the 300 hp range.
I'd go with a 4.3 before a 3800. V8 mpg with 6 cylinder power, in stock form.
It doesn't take much to outperform the 230 some odd ft-lbs of torque the stock 4.0 makes. A stock 3800 makes 215 ft lbs before any mods.
While not the engine I'd choose, or would probably run circles around around any 4.0/4.6 disco at even the 300 hp range.
I'd go with a 4.3 before a 3800. V8 mpg with 6 cylinder power, in stock form.
While not the engine I'd choose, or would probably run circles around around any 4.0/4.6 disco at even the 300 hp range.
I'd go with a 4.3 before a 3800. V8 mpg with 6 cylinder power, in stock form.
It's easy to machine parts and weld brackets, but you wanna redesign what was a funky computer system to begin with?....you're braver than I. Good Luck with that.
The M57 swap can reportedly be done as a perfectly integrated, virtually plug and play swap for the D2....count your blessings....and your torque/mpg gains
For all those who wanna try 3.8l's, Chevy/Ford Diesels, and even LS swaps, let us know how that's working out for ya, honestly


