Front Crossmember Disco II
#13
#14
#16
I plan on keeping mine if possible, but I also understand why people remove them. Maybe I'm just a belt and suspenders kind of guy... if the suspenders are free anyway.
#17
#18
So what your saying is the manufacturer told you the cross member is basically there for no reason?
Sorry dude, I find that very hard to believe. First off the company that Land Rover used to manufacture the frame components wont never say anything is unnecessary to Land Rovers design, because there could be potential problems making statements against a company feeds you.
And if they were the ones that designed and manufactured said part why in hell would a company ever admit to it being basically a paper weight?
Sorry Im calling BS.
#19
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. And yes, you are correct, they "won't never" say anything to us. Disregarding that, The company I work for works very closely with two major chassis players in the UK, without going into much detail(not that you care, you clearly know everything!) they essentially said that while it was in fact added to the Discovery 2, it made no real structural difference to the chassis.
Not that I really care, you can speculate all you want. Your opinions are just that, opinions. What I know has not been guessed. You are free to believe whatever you'd like.
Not that I really care, you can speculate all you want. Your opinions are just that, opinions. What I know has not been guessed. You are free to believe whatever you'd like.
#20
Im the one that sounds like he knows everything... I think not pal. Clearly you must be in the Land Rover secret circle of knowledge.... I stand corrected.
And if I were you, I wouldn't be spouting off insider information on a public forum if your so in the know... may cause problems at work wouldn't you say??
And if I were you, I wouldn't be spouting off insider information on a public forum if your so in the know... may cause problems at work wouldn't you say??