Discovery II Talk about the Land Rover Discovery II within.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

huh?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 28, 2011 | 10:27 PM
  #1  
montana968's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Drifting
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: montana
Default huh?

i know i am new here but is not an LR2 the same as an discovery II? just asking.
 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2011 | 10:31 PM
  #2  
sloppyjoe's Avatar
TReK
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,081
Likes: 4
From: Kirkland,WA
Default

Originally Posted by montana968
i know i am new here but is not an LR2 the same as an discovery II? just asking.

LR2 is a small V6 powered truck driven by women,,,like so




this is a discovery II

 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2011 | 10:33 PM
  #3  
Snafu / Disco Fries's Avatar
Recovery Vehicle
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 8
From: NNJ
Default

No, it is the newer version of the Freelander. Pretty much a competitor to the BMW X3, Acura RDX, Audi Q5 and Infiniti EX.
 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2011 | 10:36 PM
  #4  
montana968's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Drifting
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: montana
Default

well, mine has a v8, i did not know that in 2000 a v6 was even an option. lol i get it now. And yes i 4by with mine. In montana we don't call it 4-wheeling, we call it 4byin'. But yes you were crystal clear and thank you for real.
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2011 | 10:11 AM
  #5  
antichrist's Avatar
Baja
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,232
Likes: 52
From: Georgia, USA
Default

Yeah, it was really dumb naming in North America by Land Rover
In the ROW;
Discovery 1
Discovery 2
Discovery 3
Discovery 4

Freelander
Freelander 2

Here it's;
Freelander
LR2
Discovery 1
Discovery 2
LR3
LR4

So are LR3 and LR4 follow-on from LR2 or Discovery 2? What would be the logical assumption?
I know what they are, but sometimes I want to slap Land Rover.
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2011 | 10:41 AM
  #6  
Bundu's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 4
Default

I guess it's the marketing sops that came up with the naming, they were wanting to get away from the Freelander name because it was real bad (the Freelander that is), then they fooked up everything else.
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2011 | 11:18 AM
  #7  
sloan74's Avatar
Winching
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte NC
Default

Originally Posted by Bundu
I guess it's the marketing sops that came up with the naming, they were wanting to get away from the Freelander name because it was real bad (the Freelander that is), then they fooked up everything else.
I will agree with this. The Freelander failed horribly. They had to rename it for the US market.
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2011 | 11:42 AM
  #8  
kcabpilot's Avatar
Three Wheeling
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From:
Default

I'm pretty sure it was the LR3 name that came first. I read they wanted to impress on people that it had virtually nothing in common with the Discovery II and that it was an entirely new vehicle. Of course every where else it was called the Discovery III. I think most people agree they should have kept the Disco moniker since they are British and it has that heritage thing going for it but too late now.

Then came the LR2 which sort of made sense until they came out with the LR4, I guess because they didn't want to call it the LR3 II which sounds like weak beer here in the US. But this sort of paints the LR2 into a corner. I mean, where's it gonna go from here, LR2 II, LR2B??
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2011 | 03:47 PM
  #9  
tweakrover's Avatar
Pro Wrench
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,348
Likes: 3
From: North Carolina Coast
Default

i think they were thinking that if they renamed the freelander the LR2 people would think its just a smaller LR3, kinda like bmw's have the 3,5,and 7 series.
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2011 | 04:49 PM
  #10  
jafir's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,847
Likes: 106
From: Arkansas
Default

Although I wasn't alive at the time, I'm thinking it was a whole lot easier when they just had the "Land Rover" and all you worried about was the wheel base.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 PM.