Interpreting Cylinder Compression Testing Results
#1
Interpreting Cylinder Compression Testing Results
I'm trying to chase down an increasingly persistent misfire on #6 (P0306) and an intermittent random misfire (P0300).
Vehicle info:
-99 Disco 2 currently w/ 131500 miles
-New head gaskets and cylinder head resurface at 90,000 miles
-No appreciable coolant leaks (checked daily - level stays the same)
-No appreciable oil leaks (checked daily - level stays the same)
-Occasional light wispy smoke from exhaust at start up but nothing especially remarkable
-No smoky exhaust
-No liquids from the exhaust pipe (whenever I've checked)
-No coolant smells (detected by me)
-Engine runs a little rougher than usual but not by much.
-Slightly less power than normal.
-Checking the serial number stamped on my engine shows that the compression ratio for my engine is 9:35:1
-Brand new fully charged battery
Compression Test Results (with brand new fully charged battery):
cylinder dry/wet
#8 82 / 90 **** #7 170 / -
#6 56 / 62 **** #5 170 / -
#4 152 / - **** #3 167 / -
#2 180 / - **** #1 174 / -
Considering the above info, which is most likely indicated?:
a) blown head gasket
and/or
b) broken camshaft
and/or
c) sticking or broken exhaust valve
and/or
d) piston rings
or
e) who the hell knows, go ask Who The Hell.
Other info:
500 miles ago, an independent Land Rover shop did a compression test, with the old battery that failed their load test; and they said, without a doubt, based soley on their compression test results, that I absolutely needed a $2500 (or more) valve job. Apparently, unlike most of their other customers, I lack enough faith to just take their word and blindly throw $2500 at a problem. I did my own compression test as soon as I got my truck home (with the same battery but letting the engine run for a minute or so between testing each cylinder). I got very different results:
Them with old batt / (Me with old batt)/ [Me with new batt + 500 miles]
#8 120 / (130) / [82] #7 125 /(136) / [170]
#6 90 / (100) / [56] #5 125 / (135) / [170]
#4 95 / (133) / [152] #3 125 / (125) / [167]
#2 125 / (137) / [180] #1 105 / (125) [174]
Should the differences between mine and the independent shop's compression test results make me wary of this independent shop's integrity and/or competence? (Especially when you consider that they insisted that I needed a $2500 valve job and "strongly recommend(ed) against just getting" the $1700 head gasket replacement job, and said that it could cost more once they remove the heads and take a look etc)?
I'll appreciate all considered and/or expert opinions, thoughts, comments, judgements, and guesses. (Irreverent but humorous responses are always welcome.)
Thanks,
Thomas
Vehicle info:
-99 Disco 2 currently w/ 131500 miles
-New head gaskets and cylinder head resurface at 90,000 miles
-No appreciable coolant leaks (checked daily - level stays the same)
-No appreciable oil leaks (checked daily - level stays the same)
-Occasional light wispy smoke from exhaust at start up but nothing especially remarkable
-No smoky exhaust
-No liquids from the exhaust pipe (whenever I've checked)
-No coolant smells (detected by me)
-Engine runs a little rougher than usual but not by much.
-Slightly less power than normal.
-Checking the serial number stamped on my engine shows that the compression ratio for my engine is 9:35:1
-Brand new fully charged battery
Compression Test Results (with brand new fully charged battery):
cylinder dry/wet
#8 82 / 90 **** #7 170 / -
#6 56 / 62 **** #5 170 / -
#4 152 / - **** #3 167 / -
#2 180 / - **** #1 174 / -
Considering the above info, which is most likely indicated?:
a) blown head gasket
and/or
b) broken camshaft
and/or
c) sticking or broken exhaust valve
and/or
d) piston rings
or
e) who the hell knows, go ask Who The Hell.
Other info:
500 miles ago, an independent Land Rover shop did a compression test, with the old battery that failed their load test; and they said, without a doubt, based soley on their compression test results, that I absolutely needed a $2500 (or more) valve job. Apparently, unlike most of their other customers, I lack enough faith to just take their word and blindly throw $2500 at a problem. I did my own compression test as soon as I got my truck home (with the same battery but letting the engine run for a minute or so between testing each cylinder). I got very different results:
Them with old batt / (Me with old batt)/ [Me with new batt + 500 miles]
#8 120 / (130) / [82] #7 125 /(136) / [170]
#6 90 / (100) / [56] #5 125 / (135) / [170]
#4 95 / (133) / [152] #3 125 / (125) / [167]
#2 125 / (137) / [180] #1 105 / (125) [174]
Should the differences between mine and the independent shop's compression test results make me wary of this independent shop's integrity and/or competence? (Especially when you consider that they insisted that I needed a $2500 valve job and "strongly recommend(ed) against just getting" the $1700 head gasket replacement job, and said that it could cost more once they remove the heads and take a look etc)?
I'll appreciate all considered and/or expert opinions, thoughts, comments, judgements, and guesses. (Irreverent but humorous responses are always welcome.)
Thanks,
Thomas
Last edited by twaszak; 11-15-2010 at 08:54 PM.
#2
#4
plugs in or out?
- I don't know the independent shop did their test with or without plugs.
- My first test is with individual plugs removed. (one plug out at a time)
- My last test (with new battery + 500) is with all plugs out, a warm engine, and accelerator floored during 10 cycle crank...
- My first test is with individual plugs removed. (one plug out at a time)
- My last test (with new battery + 500) is with all plugs out, a warm engine, and accelerator floored during 10 cycle crank...
#5
Take it to a different shop.
The battery will make no difference in the numbers. With a good battery the engine will turn over faster but that wont make any difference on the compression.
The only way to tell for 100% what is wrong is to pull the heads.
If the cam were broken it wouldnt run.
It could be a sludge problem and the sludge is making the valves stick.
The battery will make no difference in the numbers. With a good battery the engine will turn over faster but that wont make any difference on the compression.
The only way to tell for 100% what is wrong is to pull the heads.
If the cam were broken it wouldnt run.
It could be a sludge problem and the sludge is making the valves stick.
#6
#8
Thanks Fireman, Novadisco2, Spike555, and Disco Mike
I did a wet compression test on #8 and #6 cylinders.
Cylinder #8 dry = 82 wet = 90
Cylinder #6 dry = 56 wet = 62
There is a slight increase of 6 - 8 PSI. Is this increase "within normal limits? Or is that a significant enough of a PSI increase to suggest piston/ring/engine block problems?
How do I find the cylinders "top dead center" for the leak down test?
Thanks again..
Thomas
I did a wet compression test on #8 and #6 cylinders.
Cylinder #8 dry = 82 wet = 90
Cylinder #6 dry = 56 wet = 62
There is a slight increase of 6 - 8 PSI. Is this increase "within normal limits? Or is that a significant enough of a PSI increase to suggest piston/ring/engine block problems?
How do I find the cylinders "top dead center" for the leak down test?
Thanks again..
Thomas
#9
#10
hopefully valve/seat issue and not cracked head issue... Am I right in my assumption that the only way to deal with a cracked head is to completely replace it with a new cylinder head? IE: The only use for a cracked head is as a door stop or scrap?
Can anyone tell me how to find "top dead center" for a lead down test?
Can anyone tell me how to find "top dead center" for a lead down test?
Last edited by twaszak; 11-16-2010 at 01:58 PM.