Discovery II Talk about the Land Rover Discovery II within.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

to roto flex or not to roto flex...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 1, 2009 | 01:33 PM
  #1  
Spike555's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Team Owner
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,212
Likes: 98
From: Grand Rapids MI
Default to roto flex or not to roto flex...

Ok, all of you with a 1997-1999 DI do you have a roto flex on your rear drive shaft or a u-joint at the rear differential?
 
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2009 | 02:41 PM
  #2  
hazletbassist89's Avatar
Recovery Vehicle
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
From: Hazlet, NJ
Default

My 96 has the rotoflex but between the 126k miles it has on it and my lift coming up hopefully soon I have been weighing the possibility of either a new one or the u joint conversion. What exactly is the difference? Actually I really only need to know which is better if any off road.
 
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2009 | 02:58 PM
  #3  
Disco Mike's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 25,707
Likes: 108
From: Denver, Colorado
Default

Spike, why are you asking??
As long as you don't exceed a 3" lift you won't have any problem, except once every 80,000 to 100,000 you will need to replace it.
 
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2009 | 03:03 PM
  #4  
Spike555's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Team Owner
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,212
Likes: 98
From: Grand Rapids MI
Default

I am asking Mike because there are conflicting reports on what years came with a roto flex and what years came with u-joints.
My '97 has 4 u-joints, so have a couple of other year on here, so I am just trying to see if we can confirm or deny the fact/myth that 4 u-joints were standard on some modle years of the DI.

Mitch-it all comes down to personal preference, neither is better than the other on stock suspension, with a big lift the rotoflex will fall apart.
 
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2009 | 04:11 PM
  #5  
Jull's Avatar
Winching
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 572
Likes: 1
From: St-Lazare-de-Bellechasse
Default

I own a 98 and I don't have the rotoflex. And with the mileage on my truck, the previous owner definitely didn't get the conversion to u-joints.
 
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2009 | 04:17 PM
  #6  
tango123's Avatar
Three Wheeling
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: brampton, ont
Default

how can you tell the difference between a rotoflex and u joint?
 
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2009 | 05:50 PM
  #7  
Spike555's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Team Owner
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,212
Likes: 98
From: Grand Rapids MI
Default

If you want to do the convertion you will need this kit.
http://www.roverparts.com/Parts/9300.cfm

This is a u-joint out of the truck.
http://roverparts.com/Parts/3092.cfm

This is a roto flex.
http://roverparts.com/Parts/TIJ000012G.cfm
The roto flex is a piece of rubber, that all, rubber.

This is what the u-joint looks like on the truck, the brass looking this is the grease zert, or nipple.

[IMG][/IMG]
 
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2009 | 06:34 PM
  #8  
Rover Chris's Avatar
Recovery Vehicle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 9
From: Chandler,AZ
Default

my 97 has a roto flex (and it looks like it may need to be replaced soon) I am asuming that this item is designed to "flex" up and down as the truck goes over bumps, is it made of like a hard rubber or something?
 
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2009 | 09:07 PM
  #9  
NiteTrain's Avatar
TReK
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,306
Likes: 3
From: Woodstock, GA
Default

chris, yeah it's made out of hard rubber. It eliminates drive line vibrations (think BMW ride component and German over engineering) I know some people on here wheel their rovers hard and haven't had a problem but when mine needs replacing I'm going with U-joints.
 
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2009 | 09:16 PM
  #10  
grussell's Avatar
Rock Crawling
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 403
Likes: 3
From: Keller, TX
Default

My 97 has 4 U-joints. I never asked why my u-joints have grease fittings and my drive shaft has grease fittings too?

I have changed the "Guibo" on my wife's 525 and it is a bear. You have to drop the exhaust to get to it, and even on jack stands there is not much clearance.
 

Last edited by grussell; Jun 1, 2009 at 09:30 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:56 AM.