Discovery II Talk about the Land Rover Discovery II within.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Which would you buy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-09-2010, 11:02 PM
Alex J's Avatar
Rock Crawling
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 25 Posts
Default Which would you buy

I've sold my M3 and will be getting another D2 this weekend and have narrowed it down to 4 different D2's but was wondering what you guys thought. The one thing I don't like about the 2002 is no CDL.

#1 2002 Westminster Edition with 101K miles and decent service history
#2 2000 one owner with top end rebuild 500 miles ago but has 190K
#3 1999 randomly dies (probably crank sensor) and RR door doesn't open. 151K, no service history besides oil changes. The big advantage this one has is that I can probably get it for less than $3K
#4 1999 with 116K miles, no service history because it is at an independant dealer but it looks clean in and out, no dents and is about 1 mile from me.
 
  #2  
Old 12-09-2010, 11:08 PM
maxman's Avatar
Three Wheeling
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'll leave your question to the experts... But, you sold an M3 to buy a 2nd Disco? They should make a LR commercial out of that.
 
  #3  
Old 12-09-2010, 11:28 PM
sloppyjoe's Avatar
TReK
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kirkland,WA
Posts: 2,081
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

what are the dollar amounts tied to each?
 
  #4  
Old 12-09-2010, 11:51 PM
bosshogt's Avatar
Recovery Vehicle
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,151
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

I would skip those. They are all 9 to 11 years old. I dont know your budget. But I would hold out for sweet deal on a 2004. There are plenty on eBay and Craigs list right now. I always think younger and lower miles is better on a Land Rover. Also gas is going to approach over $3 a gal at years end. You know there will be some cheap *** folks that cant take the heat.
 
  #5  
Old 12-09-2010, 11:58 PM
buick215's Avatar
Winching
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 676
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's hard to say without knowing the prices, but I don't like #2 and #3. #2 has 190,000 miles which is a lot but what worries me the most is that they spent a lot of money on the top end rebuilt and than decided to sell it after 500 miles. It might have serious problems or the top end repair is just a band aid to be able to get rid of it. #3 has 151,000 miles, no service history, and randomly dies. It might not be the crank position sensor, who knows. If it is a simple and relatively inexpensive fix like the crank position sensor than why don't the owners fix it and sell it or keep it. #1 sounds like the best even though it doesn't have CDL. It has 101,000 miles and has a decent service history which is real important especially on these trucks. If CDL is a must than I would pass on all of them and keep looking.
 
  #6  
Old 12-10-2010, 12:38 AM
Alex J's Avatar
Rock Crawling
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

I left the prices out in my first post to try and make it more unbiased but here they are.

#1 $5000 obo
#2 $5500
#3 $3300
#4 $4800 probably not flexible cause it's on a lot

CDL isn't super important but it would be nice in the future. I'd love to get an 04 but I can't find one with the options I want for less than $9500 which is about $4000 out of my budget. One thing I like about the 2002 is that it has the updated mounting points for a child seat which would make taking my sons seat in and out much easier. Does anyone have production numbers and interior photos for a Westminster edition? I couldn't find anything online besides one person claiming there were only 300 world wide 2002 Westminster Edition D2's.
 
  #7  
Old 12-10-2010, 12:49 AM
sloppyjoe's Avatar
TReK
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kirkland,WA
Posts: 2,081
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

#1 i says
 
  #8  
Old 12-10-2010, 12:54 AM
buick215's Avatar
Winching
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 676
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

#1 or keep looking.
 
  #9  
Old 12-10-2010, 05:31 AM
Fireman's Avatar
Mudding
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Allentown, PA
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bosshogt
I would skip those. They are all 9 to 11 years old. I dont know your budget. But I would hold out for sweet deal on a 2004. There are plenty on eBay and Craigs list right now. I always think younger and lower miles is better on a Land Rover. Also gas is going to approach over $3 a gal at years end. You know there will be some cheap *** folks that cant take the heat.
Going to approach? In PA, regular is over $3 now, and the premium I use is almost $3.30!
 
  #10  
Old 12-10-2010, 06:17 AM
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 5,763
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fireman
Going to approach? In PA, regular is over $3 now, and the premium I use is almost $3.30!
HAHA that is what i was thinking. we are up to $3.59 for 91 octane.

i would try and get the westminster for $3000. you have to take into consideration that if the head gaskets were not done that may be one of your first major issues.

i still cant believe how expensive these trucks are on the west coast... i have bought 3 99's in the past two years all with under 100k for $3,000, $1,000 and $1,500
 


Quick Reply: Which would you buy



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:08 PM.