Downshifting vs Braking
I am not a highly technical car person and have heard many theories on this philosophy but I wanted to float it out here to see what you guys think.
Is it bad for the car (specifically the transmission) to downshift when coming to a stop on a hill or from a higher speed? I tend to downshift instead of braking to extend the life of my brakes. I don't do it at every stop but tend to do it on a hill or coming off a highway exit ramp but usually do it several times on an average trip to the store, restaurant, etc.
My theory is that as long as you don't do it every time you stop it should be fine but then another side of me says that brakes are way cheaper than a new transmission. Then another side of me says that this is why they designed the transmission this way. By the end of all of my conflicting thoughts I am confused.
As I said, I have read a couple of theories in the past but would be interested in what you guys think.
Opinions?
Is it bad for the car (specifically the transmission) to downshift when coming to a stop on a hill or from a higher speed? I tend to downshift instead of braking to extend the life of my brakes. I don't do it at every stop but tend to do it on a hill or coming off a highway exit ramp but usually do it several times on an average trip to the store, restaurant, etc.
My theory is that as long as you don't do it every time you stop it should be fine but then another side of me says that brakes are way cheaper than a new transmission. Then another side of me says that this is why they designed the transmission this way. By the end of all of my conflicting thoughts I am confused.
As I said, I have read a couple of theories in the past but would be interested in what you guys think.
Opinions?
Driving in the Rockies I always use engine braking descending steep grades. I feel that I have more control doing that than riding the brakes. I've never had any transmission problems doing that, but I double the life of the brakes.
Actually I have heard that new transmissions are $7k from LR and I frequently hear about $800 - $1,000 brake jobs.
The question is ultimately; Is engine braking really bad for the car? And will it damage the transmission?
The question is ultimately; Is engine braking really bad for the car? And will it damage the transmission?
Maybe. I think LR Transmissions are built like a brick outhouse. I drive my mine though, I don't baby it. It just pains me to drive down I70 from the Tunnel and to Denver and see people ride their brakes all the way down the hill. That can't be good.
its fine for the trans. with your six speed, i wouldnt downshift all the way to 1st, but thats really just because its not a comfortable shift. only problem that may occur would be your more prone to vacuum leaks under decel
Why chance it.
As for driving down the I-70, I do it all the time running between 60 and 70 MPH with ne need to use the gears or brakes. Actually, I know very few, if any Rover owners that use their tranny for their high speed braking.


