29K no maintenance records vs. 48K w/ records
Hi folks -
I have been wanting an LR4 forever!! I'm finally going to do it - but I can't decide which car is better in terms of mechanical issues.... given that they are both the same year - is it better to have a car that's been driven less, or one that has meticulous dealer maintenance done.
TIA!!!
I have been wanting an LR4 forever!! I'm finally going to do it - but I can't decide which car is better in terms of mechanical issues.... given that they are both the same year - is it better to have a car that's been driven less, or one that has meticulous dealer maintenance done.
TIA!!!
Also a reality - up to 29k doesn’t really require any service other than a few oil changes.
id also eval - are you buying from private party or dealer?
if private party, hopefully can get a sense of their integrity.
Like other poster said - Land Rover should be able to give you an idea of service history with VIN. Also, most oil change shops report service on CArfax.. definitely pull a carfax.
I’d personally look to go with lower mileage. The difference between the two is close to 2 years of driving wear.
Other factors - what is price diff? What is the year?
id also eval - are you buying from private party or dealer?
if private party, hopefully can get a sense of their integrity.
Like other poster said - Land Rover should be able to give you an idea of service history with VIN. Also, most oil change shops report service on CArfax.. definitely pull a carfax.
I’d personally look to go with lower mileage. The difference between the two is close to 2 years of driving wear.
Other factors - what is price diff? What is the year?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



