RG&B Soft Shackle review
#2
There really should be some product warnings.
Because of the nature of how they need to/can be rigged the actual load rating of the rope needs to be reduced by a very significant amount. People might assume if the plasma rope is rated at 80,000lb then the shackle is rated the same. That's not the case.
There was a discussion about them on DWeb.
Because of the nature of how they need to/can be rigged the actual load rating of the rope needs to be reduced by a very significant amount. People might assume if the plasma rope is rated at 80,000lb then the shackle is rated the same. That's not the case.
There was a discussion about them on DWeb.
#3
There really should be some product warnings.
Because of the nature of how they need to/can be rigged the actual load rating of the rope needs to be reduced by a very significant amount. People might assume if the plasma rope is rated at 80,000lb then the shackle is rated the same. That's not the case.
There was a discussion about them on DWeb.
Because of the nature of how they need to/can be rigged the actual load rating of the rope needs to be reduced by a very significant amount. People might assume if the plasma rope is rated at 80,000lb then the shackle is rated the same. That's not the case.
There was a discussion about them on DWeb.
They are ratted for 18k working load. stamped on every one. I am surprised that you do not like these and feel they are unsafe.
#4
#5
Well, I haven't seen anything authoritative on the material or rope diameter, so it's difficult to really say if that's an accurate WLL. Based on what I've seen that WLL is very suspect since it looks to be based on the rope material/diameter in a straight pull, not how it's used in this application.
#6
Originally Posted by antichrist
Like breaking during a double line pull up a steep incline and your entire vehicle goes flying?
Maybe I'm wrong and it in fact does have some special properties that allows a person to ignore established safe rigging practices when using it.
Maybe I'm wrong and it in fact does have some special properties that allows a person to ignore established safe rigging practices when using it.
The 9mm ones that Lucky8 sells have been tested on a 50,000lb tensile tester. This machine is calibrated by a third party every year, in part because the manufacturer must keep its test equipment up to date to comply with their military contracts.
The 9mm soft shackle is rated for a Working Load Limit of 18,000lbs. Today I had a brand new soft shackle tested and it broke at 26,088lbs. That is like hanging more than another Land Rover off the shackle past its Working Load Limit.
One thing to keep in mind with these shackles or any synthetic winch line is that they do have a shelf life. The manufacturer did a simulated long-term test of the shackle and these were the results:
First it was cycled 200 times from 14,000lbs - 20,000lbs. No damage. This should be close to the maximum pulling power of a 9k winch connected to a ****** block.
Then they upped the pulling power and kept on going. It took 73 cycles in the 20,000lb - 25,000lb range for the shackle to finally break at 25,182lbs. Keep in mind that the shackle was not allowed to cool down after each test as it was cycled continuously to test its durability in being loaded and unloaded repeatedly.
Here is some quick math:
If you were to go out twice a month and use the shackle at its maximum rating twice each outing, it would take you just shy of 6 years to mimic our testing. Not bad for a $25 shackle.
video of todays test.
Soft shackle test - YouTube
Todays test
I hope this helps put to rest some of the concerns that some people have had.
#7
I'd be shocked if the DoD would accept a design factor significantly less that 2:1 for shackles. I would be surprised if a 5:1 design factor isn't specified. Since you're involved in military acquisition I expect it would be easy for you to look up.
All rigging scenarios should have risk management performed before proceeding.
All rigging scenarios should have risk management performed before proceeding.
Last edited by antichrist; 12-29-2011 at 06:36 AM.
#8
By your logic my 5/8" shackle would cost $36,000. But you're right, it's completely irrelevant to the discussion.
With all due respect, if you don't trust the soft shackle then obviously you are welcome to your own opinion, and are free to refrain from purchase.
Freedom of choice is what I serve to defend and what makes us a great nation.
#10
But then, having observed a few recoveries....