2024 130 Owners
#11
![Default](https://landroverforums.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
We’ve had our 130 for a couple of weeks now. Really surprised it isn’t standard equipment or isn’t readily available as an option. It’s a no brainer. Do you have the part number? I might as well get mine in the queue. LOL.
#12
![Default](https://landroverforums.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The part number is LR190079. Good luck with that 🎈
#16
![Default](https://landroverforums.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Also agree, the tray is also very flimsy clicked in. I am actually not sure if this is a show stopper. The whole thing also makes the loading height a bit uncomfortable and also reduced trunk height gy a good 4-5 inch. It isn't ideal. Would they have made it flush with the same ability of rugged plastic lining, it would be a no brainer. Also not sure how much load you can put on the trunk tray as there is no reinforcement inside. It is a big shelf. So probably needs some 2x4 cuts to make it stable.
Overall disappointing but that is best as you can get from the LR.
Overall disappointing but that is best as you can get from the LR.
#17
![Default](https://landroverforums.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It's already difficult enough for a Labrador or Bloodhound to jump into the 110, even with the suspension lowered. The extra couple inches of floor height does create a flat floor but adds to the gymnastics challenge when loading up the dogs. Also while I'm banging on about it, the paneling and carpets back there look like they're quite cheap and ill fitting.
I am so disappointed in LR for the lack of refinement in the loadspace of the 90 and 130. By contrast the 110 is great back there. The others, and sorry if you have one, but I look at that wayback and it's a big miss from a product design perspective. I don't see how anyone would look at it and think it's the proper solution. Too much compromise in the floor and seating mounts. They should have spent more money and re engineered the floor pan to accommodate properly designed seat mounts to avoid the issue. That is all this is, cost savings with a patch.
I am so disappointed in LR for the lack of refinement in the loadspace of the 90 and 130. By contrast the 110 is great back there. The others, and sorry if you have one, but I look at that wayback and it's a big miss from a product design perspective. I don't see how anyone would look at it and think it's the proper solution. Too much compromise in the floor and seating mounts. They should have spent more money and re engineered the floor pan to accommodate properly designed seat mounts to avoid the issue. That is all this is, cost savings with a patch.
Last edited by nashvegas; 03-23-2024 at 06:32 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Steedracer (03-24-2024)
#18
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
driccio
2020 Defender
14
07-29-2022 02:06 PM