2020 Defender Talk about the new 2020 Land Rover Defender
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Even more Defender variant$ coming

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 13, 2021 | 10:08 PM
  #21  
Moretti's Avatar
Winching
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 712
Likes: 248
From: Pacific North West Wonderland
Default

Originally Posted by Count Laszlo
That’s a shame because I thought the Defender monocoque construction was the creme de la creme of their platforms, more exclusive to the Defender branding as an exception and utilized for a much longer period ‘JLR claims the lightweight-aluminium monocoque construction of the Defender is the stiffest body structure the brand has ever produced’, but rather now, it’ll simply be replaced in a few short years.
Didnt JLR want to be completely electric by 2030?
 
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2021 | 10:10 PM
  #22  
_Allegedly's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Pro Wrench
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,558
Likes: 1,439
Default

Originally Posted by Moretti
Didnt JLR want to be completely electric by 2030?
As a last resort maybe.
https://media.jaguarlandrover.com/ne...cell-prototype
 
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2021 | 10:12 PM
  #23  
Count Laszlo's Avatar
Rock Crawling
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 303
Likes: 198
From: San Francisco
Default

Originally Posted by Moretti
Didnt JLR want to be completely electric by 2030?
I really hope not.

What I don’t understand is when our entire electric grid and infrastructure support framework is going to be in place to support all these electric cars within these insanely aggressive timelines? We have a hard time building a 1-mile bridge within a 15-year period, how are we going to pull this off? I still think it’s completely fanciful this transition will happen in the next 4 to 9 years. Over the summer here in California folks with electric cars were asked not to charge them to reduce the blackouts for a few days, I think we have about 2.2% EVs. Sounds radical.

I absolutely loath toasters.
 

Last edited by Count Laszlo; Sep 13, 2021 at 10:19 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2021 | 11:55 PM
  #24  
Vin's Avatar
Vin
Mudding
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 116
Likes: 64
Default

Originally Posted by Count Laszlo
Over the summer here in California folks with electric cars were asked not to charge them to reduce the blackouts for a few days, I think we have about 2.2% EVs.
Ironically, the car culture of California is contributing to the reason for rolling blackouts. BTW, I have a level 2 charger at home that, when in use, consumes more electricity than anything else in my house, including my air conditioning, so it kinda makes sense. Don’t you think?

Originally Posted by Count Laszlo
I absolutely loath toasters.
You should drive an I Pace and reassess.
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2021 | 10:14 AM
  #25  
Moretti's Avatar
Winching
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 712
Likes: 248
From: Pacific North West Wonderland
Default

Originally Posted by Count Laszlo
I really hope not.

What I don’t understand is when our entire electric grid and infrastructure support framework is going to be in place to support all these electric cars within these insanely aggressive timelines? We have a hard time building a 1-mile bridge within a 15-year period, how are we going to pull this off? I still think it’s completely fanciful this transition will happen in the next 4 to 9 years. Over the summer here in California folks with electric cars were asked not to charge them to reduce the blackouts for a few days, I think we have about 2.2% EVs. Sounds radical.

I absolutely loath toasters.
All new construction in California is required to have PV solar systems now right? Obviously we need to incorporate more renewable energy sources into our power grids. People complain about change though and there is alot of money lost in the transition.
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2021 | 10:16 AM
  #26  
Count Laszlo's Avatar
Rock Crawling
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 303
Likes: 198
From: San Francisco
Default

Originally Posted by Moretti
All new construction in California is required to have PV solar systems now right? Obviously we need to incorporate more renewable energy sources into our power grids. People complain about change though and there is alot of money lost in the transition.
I think it really all comes down to Jevons Paradox.

 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2021 | 09:37 AM
  #27  
Mechano2020's Avatar
Rock Crawling
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 497
Likes: 234
From: DFW
Default

Electric or electrified cars are a beautiful utopia. Kinda like Marvel movies.
Things change quick when reality gets in the way. Minerals (scarcity of them) , mining of minerals ( can't dig with electric excavators ), batteries - production to safe disposal ( very expensive and shorter time than a combustion engine), power grid - yeah, producing that at mass levels is not done with solar or wind, and the reduced driving range, compared with IC engines. Charging my vehicles for 1-2 hrs (if and where I might find a station ) to complete a trip of 3-4 hrs in 6-8 hrs is a deal killer.
But, yes, is a nice day dream.... and politicians will impose it on the polulace - for the good of the "collective" with total disregard for the final outcome, while they jettison on Leer jets and big limos.
Call me in 20 years from now and tell me how that ends....
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2021 | 12:53 PM
  #28  
Vin's Avatar
Vin
Mudding
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 116
Likes: 64
Default

Originally Posted by Mechano2020
Electric or electrified cars are a beautiful utopia. Kinda like Marvel movies.
Things change quick when reality gets in the way. Minerals (scarcity of them) , mining of minerals ( can't dig with electric excavators ), batteries - production to safe disposal ( very expensive and shorter time than a combustion engine), power grid - yeah, producing that at mass levels is not done with solar or wind, and the reduced driving range, compared with IC engines. Charging my vehicles for 1-2 hrs (if and where I might find a station ) to complete a trip of 3-4 hrs in 6-8 hrs is a deal killer.
But, yes, is a nice day dream.... and politicians will impose it on the polulace - for the good of the "collective" with total disregard for the final outcome, while they jettison on Leer jets and big limos.
Call me in 20 years from now and tell me how that ends....
That’s Luddite thinking. I bet kerosene distributors made similar arguments against oil 150 years ago. Things change quickly, and perhaps that’s what you are reacting to, but there are plenty of DC Fast Charge locations along major interstates that make your deal killer sound like misinformation.

Have you ever even driven an electric vehicle? The torque alone is worth the price of being an early adopter.
 

Last edited by Vin; Sep 15, 2021 at 12:54 PM. Reason: Grammar.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2021 | 01:15 PM
  #29  
_Allegedly's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Pro Wrench
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,558
Likes: 1,439
Default

Originally Posted by Vin
That’s Luddite thinking. I bet kerosene distributors made similar arguments against oil 150 years ago. Things change quickly, and perhaps that’s what you are reacting to, but there are plenty of DC Fast Charge locations along major interstates that make your deal killer sound like misinformation.

Have you ever even driven an electric vehicle? The torque alone is worth the price of being an early adopter.
The kerosene distributor you speak of was John D Rockefeller.

He did "okay" but, since 40% of a barrel of crude is gasoline which had no use at all and had to be burned off as waste, his real money only came when the ICE was invented.

Gasoline is still otherwise useless and would have to be burned again or pumped back into the ground if we stop using it. The world currently uses enough gasoline to circle the globe 4x per year stored in barrels.

The rest of the barrel of crude is the foundation of modern civilization. Everything is from crude so we can't stop pumping.
 
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2021 | 01:34 PM
  #30  
Mechano2020's Avatar
Rock Crawling
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 497
Likes: 234
From: DFW
Default Missing the point ...

Originally Posted by Vin
That’s Luddite thinking. I bet kerosene distributors made similar arguments against oil 150 years ago. Things change quickly, and perhaps that’s what you are reacting to, but there are plenty of DC Fast Charge locations along major interstates that make your deal killer sound like misinformation.

Have you ever even driven an electric vehicle? The torque alone is worth the price of being an early adopter.
You are completely missing the point, but I get it ... you are on the "greenie" side.
There are not enough resources in the world to produce the batteries needed for the "new" cars.
Yes, if you want just a few selected ones to drive, then that may be possible, but there will never be a 1:1 replacement.
You also miss the point on the charging too - why should I wait hours to charge, when I can get it filled up in merely minutes ?
Where do you thing that electric power comes from ? From the outlet ? NO ! it comes from coal, or other fossil fuels.
Hydro, solar and power are minimal. Look at the California experiment - they doing "great" !
From cradle to the grave the electric cars are more polluting than a gasoline engine cars.... but don't let the facts stand in the way of the truth.
Yeah, you almost got me with the torque - almost become a true believer.
That was not the point ! yes they do have torque. No one debates that, but at what cost !?
Anyways, as I said, call me in 20 years and tell me how that worked out - electric cars that is.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:21 AM.