Discovery II Talk about the Land Rover Discovery II within.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

17 MPG - city, confirmed...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 18, 2014 | 08:18 PM
  #1  
Externet's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Recovery Vehicle
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 976
Likes: 154
From: Mideast US
Smile 17 MPG - city, confirmed...

Hi.
10 gallons ----> 170 miles.
Measured soon fuel light on to soon fuel light on, flat surface, average speed under 40 mph, never reached 50 mph, no air conditioner use these days, mostly flat terrain. About 20 cold starts plus dozens of hot starts.
Tires are at 38 psi, brakes are not even slightly binding, the car slides on the tiniest slope if not held braking. No front driveshaft nor front axles, as I never go off roads. Attached.

On an older post I reported 18 MPG on hilly freeway pulling a loaded utility trailer.
Still believe am getting 20+ MPG - freeway without trailer, some day I will report.
 
Attached Thumbnails 17 MPG - city, confirmed...-photo-0057.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2014 | 08:25 PM
  #2  
MetalMarine's Avatar
Mudding
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 123
Likes: 1
From: Austin, TX.
Default

nice, im floating around 13mpg atm. hope to increase it as i start the engine rebuild process.
 
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2014 | 07:56 AM
  #3  
stb616's Avatar
Mudding
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 195
Likes: 7
Default

There are some vehicles that just do better than others, but I also know people who seems to always claim higher than attainable mpg numbers. Even a 1/2 gallon variance would drop you to 16 using only 170 miles.

That's awesome if your numbers are accurate, but I have to say I'm skeptical.

I'm curious though...what have you done to your truck, brand of plugs, brand of fuel, etc, etc.....?
 
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2014 | 08:00 AM
  #4  
The_OGCJR's Avatar
Recovery Vehicle
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 808
Likes: 172
From: austin texas
Default

I can see this mpg since you removed the front driveshaft and axles. How did you do that btw?
 
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2014 | 08:15 AM
  #5  
RicketyTick's Avatar
Recovery Vehicle
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 24
Default

hmmmm! my average is 11.7 right now, mostly city using high octane premium.
on the hwy at constant speed around 70 the ug shows 15-16 instant but, then I kill it with the usual stop and go short runs.
 

Last edited by RicketyTick; Oct 19, 2014 at 07:30 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2014 | 09:29 AM
  #6  
Externet's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Recovery Vehicle
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 976
Likes: 154
From: Mideast US
Default

Thanks.
For the question brand of plugs, fuel. Have not replaced them in 2 years, do not know what they are. The fuel in use is the cheapest 87 octane at any random fuel station I come across.
Driving habits -almost like a gramma.

Sometimes I fill only 10.0 gallons at fuel light on to track mileage and note odometer on the receipt. I do not have an UG, and the numbers are just that, the figures that show up with the simple calculation method described.

How did I remove the front drive should be somewhere on a post like " It is now a rear wheel drive only"
 
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2014 | 10:24 AM
  #7  
OCMike's Avatar
Mudding
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 173
Likes: 33
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Have you tried Fuelly - Track and Compare your MPG I used to use them to keep track of my fuel economy back when I had my 4Runner.
 
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2014 | 10:55 AM
  #8  
RicketyTick's Avatar
Recovery Vehicle
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 24
Default

Fill up your vehicle's gas tank. ...
Reset your car's trip meter to zero. ...
Get a true test by burning at least half of your tank, then refill. ...
Write down the number of gallons it took to fill your tank and the number of miles on your trip meter. ...
Divide the trip meter miles by the gallons of gas.
 
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2014 | 11:46 AM
  #9  
drowssap's Avatar
Baja
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 9,298
Likes: 318
From: Boston Strong
Default

I don't see your post about how you did it.
maybe you can post a link

but if you pulled the axles, r&p gears, and front drive shaft.
there would be a weight savings, plus driving like Granny.

but you now have a 2-wheel drive Bronco with the equivalent of a 250 6 cylinder. but I think even Ford went with a 300 cu in.


I thought the point of a LR was that it could get you any where at any time.


BTW
if you have removed everything front the front end and are running RWD only, you should look into a Gear Vendors unit.
you could have a 20-25mpg Discovery.
 
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2014 | 01:13 PM
  #10  
Externet's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Recovery Vehicle
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 976
Likes: 154
From: Mideast US
Default

Originally Posted by drowssap
I don't see your post about how you did it.
maybe you can post a link
----> https://landroverforums.com/forum/di...ve-only-51967/
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 PM.