Discovery II Talk about the Land Rover Discovery II within.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2003 DISCO-DEALER DID NOT DISCLOSE BODY DAMAGE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 12:40 PM
  #1  
ROLLOVER's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Default 2003 DISCO-DEALER DID NOT DISCLOSE BODY DAMAGE

I have ownedmy 2003 Disco HSE almost one week; itwas purchased from Land Rover Newport Beach. I am beginning to see why I am having electrical gremlins(brake lights come on with headlights and instrument panel lights illuminate when brake pedal is depressed). I inspected the car and have evidence that the car was hit rather hard as the rear quarter panel was replaced and the exhaust sytem has a crimp in it. The quarter panel is unpainted on the inside and has no protective undercoating. There are numerous areas of overspray as well. Dealer claims ignorance. The car was not purchased "as-is" as I purchased an extended coverage plan. Do you feel one could make a clear case for a buyback? [align=right]
[/align]
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 12:51 PM
  #2  
sayre05's Avatar
Drifting
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 2003 DISCO-DEALER DID NOT DISCLOSE BODY DAMAGE

I seem to thinkso and if they wont work with youcontact a lawyer. If they know your series they wont want the headache. Did you run a carfax report yet? If not do it and see what shows up.

Good Luck!
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 12:58 PM
  #3  
ROLLOVER's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Default RE: 2003 DISCO-DEALER DID NOT DISCLOSE BODY DAMAGE

ORIGINAL: sayre05

I seem to thinkso and if they wont work with youcontact a lawyer. If they know your series they wont want the headache. Did you run a carfax report yet? If not do it and see what shows up.

Good Luck!
I have a complete and clearCarfax report which means nothing. I understand that many remarkable events in the car's historyconveniently slip through the Carfax datatbase as their main purpose is really to help dealers sell cars. This foolish report is a nothing more than a false sense of security.
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 01:01 PM
  #4  
sayre05's Avatar
Drifting
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 2003 DISCO-DEALER DID NOT DISCLOSE BODY DAMAGE

I would never believe there was no damage just cause it is not in the Carfax but it is one more thing to check to get as much information as possible. I have a 96 Disco that has been in a fender bender that was not listed there either but I still check it!

Good Luck
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 01:23 PM
  #5  
Disco Mike's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 25,707
Likes: 107
From: Denver, Colorado
Default RE: 2003 DISCO-DEALER DID NOT DISCLOSE BODY DAMAGE

Get in touch with both your state and local D.A.'s office and see what the laws are in your area.
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2008 | 02:01 PM
  #6  
Phototone's Avatar
Mudding
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Default RE: 2003 DISCO-DEALER DID NOT DISCLOSE BODY DAMAGE

If a vehicle was damaged in some way and was not insured for the damage, or no insurance claim was filed, and no police report was issued (perhaps on private property?) then I don't see how Carfax would be able to have any record of it.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ajk150
Discovery II
16
Aug 16, 2019 01:36 PM
jegomes
Discovery II
15
Sep 9, 2011 11:30 AM
Classklown90
Discovery II
17
Dec 29, 2009 11:42 AM
photo2u
Discovery II
5
Nov 11, 2009 11:16 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:38 PM.