Discovery II Talk about the Land Rover Discovery II within.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

35"?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 19, 2012 | 01:57 PM
  #21  
grandkodiak's Avatar
Recovery Vehicle
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 1
From: Wabash
Default

Hey lr2001silver, that was your 666 post, and heres mine! What are the odds of that.
 
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2012 | 02:06 PM
  #22  
lr2001silver's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,533
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by grandkodiak
Hey lr2001silver, that was your 666 post, and heres mine! What are the odds of that.

That's pretty cool! Glad we could share that today

Hope you all are in good spirits and doing well!
 
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2012 | 07:19 PM
  #23  
ebg18t's Avatar
Rock Crawling
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 447
Likes: 1
From: Northern Vermont
Default

I had one of the larger avaliable lifts. You won't fit 35's without some serious trimming. Realistically I wouldn't have wanted the truck any taller; ie top heavy that it was on 33's.
 
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2012 | 09:05 PM
  #24  
ScreamingLife's Avatar
Rock Crawling
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 446
Likes: 3
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Default

I run 265/75R16 BFG All Terrains and they feel as though they are the perfect size. I can pretty much go anywhere my friend with a YJ with 37's can go.
 
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2012 | 12:39 AM
  #25  
ZGPhoto's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Camel Trophy
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 4,533
Likes: 103
From: Burlington, VT
Default

I like the 265/75s, but I feel like I'll enjoy the 285/75s a bit more. It's not much of a difference in size or price.
 
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2012 | 08:57 AM
  #26  
jafir's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,847
Likes: 106
From: Arkansas
Default

Have you considered 255/85r16?
 
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2012 | 09:59 AM
  #27  
ZGPhoto's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Camel Trophy
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 4,533
Likes: 103
From: Burlington, VT
Default

^ I like that size! I hadn't considered it. With the strength of the MT KM/2's sidewall I think it'd still be quite an alright tire around corners. I'll go check to see if they sell them.
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2012 | 01:22 PM
  #28  
dcarr1971's Avatar
Winching
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 609
Likes: 11
From: Pittsburgh, PA USA
Default

Originally Posted by ZGPhoto
^ I like that size! I hadn't considered it. With the strength of the MT KM/2's sidewall I think it'd still be quite an alright tire around corners. I'll go check to see if they sell them.
It's a good size, but anything bigger than a 32" can be a little rough on your CV's and axles if you aren't cautious. (I learned this the hard way at Conclave.)
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2012 | 01:26 PM
  #29  
ZGPhoto's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Camel Trophy
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 4,533
Likes: 103
From: Burlington, VT
Default

Because of the added rotational mass?
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2012 | 01:50 PM
  #30  
dcarr1971's Avatar
Winching
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 609
Likes: 11
From: Pittsburgh, PA USA
Default

I'm sure others can explain it better than I, but if you lose grip and then suddenly one tire catches, it can snap a CV or axle.

With smaller tires there usually isn't enough force to cause much damage when this happens, but with a 33" or larger tires you can shatter a CV in the blink of an eye. Here's what mine ended up looking like...

 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:54 PM.