Discovery II Talk about the Land Rover Discovery II within.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

4.0 vs 4.6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 5, 2013 | 10:07 PM
  #1  
Eldonkey's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Three Wheeling
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Default 4.0 vs 4.6

Hi Folks..

Two quick questions..

Does one of these motors have a higher likelihood of blown head gaskets or slipped sleeves over the other?

I'm assuming they are both the aluminum block, is there a feeling on which one overall is going to last longer?
 
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2013 | 11:12 PM
  #2  
dr. mordo's Avatar
Recovery Vehicle
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 52
From: Tampa, FL
Default

Are you asking about used or reman engines?
 
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2013 | 12:53 AM
  #3  
Eldonkey's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Three Wheeling
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Default

If you were to buy a 2000 vs 2004, with similar adjusted mileage and proper maintenance, is one better than the other overall..
 
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2013 | 12:58 AM
  #4  
Savannah Buzz's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 16,322
Likes: 88
From: Savannah Georgia
Default

2004 will have the edge, as early model oil pump problems have been fixed by then. The block is essentially the same, the increased displacement was achieved with different connecting rods. Both suffer from Rover overheating, so run a 180F thermostat and an OBDII scanner for temp monitoring.
 
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2013 | 07:48 AM
  #5  
Disco Mike's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 25,707
Likes: 108
From: Denver, Colorado
Default

The early oil pump issues only pertain to a specific vin range of 03's. Old Rover/Buick engines have had an issue with the oil pump gears spread across all years of production.
The 4.6 has a little more power but drops more sleeves and has the same possible head gasket failure.
What would you be using a Disco for, how mechanical are you and have you ever owned a 4 wheeler before.
My money is on a 4.0 for less issues even though it has a little less power then the 4.6.
 
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2013 | 08:13 AM
  #6  
jafir's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,847
Likes: 106
From: Arkansas
Default

If I were to need an engine for my 2003, I'd look for a GEMS 4.6 from an early P38 and swap the cam gear and crank sensor mount with the Bosch style. Lots of Land Rover techs see less serious problems with the earlier engines. They can all have head gasket issues.
 
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2013 | 08:22 AM
  #7  
Disco Mike's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 25,707
Likes: 108
From: Denver, Colorado
Default

Good way to go for sure, it was a better engine or if you could find one, a 4.2 was made from better alloys, head less problems and made good horse power.
 
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2013 | 08:34 AM
  #8  
ZGPhoto's Avatar
Camel Trophy
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 4,533
Likes: 103
From: Burlington, VT
Default

I'm with Jafir, I'd go with a Gems 4.6, but the CPS mount I wouldn't call an "easy" mod.
 
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2013 | 09:16 AM
  #9  
Dan7's Avatar
Recovery Vehicle
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 863
Likes: 18
Default

Well, the Disco's with the 4.0 were also lighter, so I wonder if performance is really all that different. A 4.6 into a DI would be an interesting mod.
 
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2013 | 11:17 AM
  #10  
jafir's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,847
Likes: 106
From: Arkansas
Default

Originally Posted by Dan7
Well, the Disco's with the 4.0 were also lighter, so I wonder if performance is really all that different. A 4.6 into a DI would be an interesting mod.
I cannot imagine they'd be that much lighter, the only significant differences are crankshafts, camshafts, pistons, and maybe rods. The longer stroke provided by the crank would probably mean it weighs more, but not much. The block is exactly the same from 4.0 to 4.6. The pistons probably are close in weight.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:31 AM.