Discovery II Talk about the Land Rover Discovery II within.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

anyone tried one of these front driveshafts?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 03-21-2015 | 08:11 AM
dusty1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,794
Likes: 210
From: dallas texas
Default

Originally Posted by ls1morethanyou
my tom woods is holding up well.... well i am also not driving it but who is keeping count anyway... haha
So that's what you're doing, your preserving Your driveline. Good call
 
  #12  
Old 03-21-2015 | 09:40 AM
ArmyRover's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,034
Likes: 1,591
From: Augusta, GA
Default

Dusty having seen your driving style I would recommend staying with a Tom Woods or GBR shaft or possibly something from the kenworth line...
 
The following users liked this post:
dusty1 (03-21-2015)
  #13  
Old 03-21-2015 | 09:58 AM
dusty1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,794
Likes: 210
From: dallas texas
Default

Originally Posted by ArmyRover
Dusty having seen your driving style I would recommend staying with a Tom Woods or GBR shaft or possibly something from the kenworth line...
Oh I have gbrs and back up gbr spare.... I just stumbled upon it and thought it was a good deal so I thought I would ask if anyone had experience. I don't need one, but somebody might.
 
  #14  
Old 03-22-2015 | 08:54 AM
Alex_M's Avatar
Camel Trophy
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 4,734
Likes: 971
From: Southwestern Virginia
Default

I might pick one up in a few weeks and see how it goes, keep the current standard duty one as a spare.
 
  #15  
Old 03-22-2015 | 05:28 PM
Bom2oo2's Avatar
Rock Crawling
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 438
Likes: 58
Default

What is better for normal driving (street use) one of those or rebuilding oem shaft with new u-joint's and centering ball ?
 
  #16  
Old 03-22-2015 | 05:42 PM
dusty1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,794
Likes: 210
From: dallas texas
Default

i'd say about the same. the shaft may be a little tougher on this, but not really the part that fails anyway. you will be getting a greasable unit either way. actually you could rebuild with the heavier duty 380 joints and it would prolly be a tougher unit
 
The following users liked this post:
Bom2oo2 (03-22-2015)
  #17  
Old 03-22-2015 | 08:36 PM
Bom2oo2's Avatar
Rock Crawling
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 438
Likes: 58
Default

Tkank's, is 380 a part# for precision or..... I am asking cause I don't know about part numbers. And what is the best for centering ball. And one more question, will they be a direct fit to oem shaft?
 
  #18  
Old 03-22-2015 | 09:32 PM
dusty1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,794
Likes: 210
From: dallas texas
Default

yes 380 is the more heavy duty uj the shaft I have listed only supplies the 369....
not sure on centering ball part number but yes all direct fit
 
The following users liked this post:
Bom2oo2 (03-22-2015)
  #19  
Old 03-23-2015 | 11:20 AM
NVDiscovery's Avatar
Rock Crawling
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 337
Likes: 63
From: Upstate South Carolina
Default

I have a GBR std front drive shaft which works well for me.
 
  #20  
Old 03-23-2015 | 07:10 PM
antichrist's Avatar
Baja
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,232
Likes: 51
From: Georgia, USA
Default

380 is a Precision 1310 series, same dimensions as the 369.
The 380 has the zerk in the end cap (rather than in the valley of the cross) which makes for a stronger u-joint, all else being the same.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by antichrist:
Bom2oo2 (03-23-2015), krammark (03-24-2015)


Quick Reply: anyone tried one of these front driveshafts?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 AM.