Discovery II Talk about the Land Rover Discovery II within.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Park brake question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 13, 2014 | 11:46 AM
  #1  
Alex_M's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Camel Trophy
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 4,743
Likes: 985
From: Southwestern Virginia
Default Park brake question

Is the park brake the black thing between the transfer case and the rear driveshaft that looks to be about the diameter of an 87 vinyl record? If so, does it only stop the rear driveshaft? If so, theoretically speaking, could you apply the park brake as you would in a front wheel drive car to do a burnout, assuming you had enough power to do so? Also, more realistically speaking, could you apply the park brake to keep driving if you lost your rotoflex and removed the rear shaft? Does the park brake work like that or does it also lock up the front?

Thanks!
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2014 | 03:49 PM
  #2  
Disco deuce's Avatar
Three Wheeling
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 77
Likes: 4
From: South Carolina
Default

Yes, yes, in theory yes, theoretically it could work but a better option would be to use the lock on the t case, if you have one. Though you would destroy your brake shoes and more than like damage the rest of the vehicle.
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2014 | 05:47 PM
  #3  
RoverMasterTech's Avatar
Recovery Vehicle
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 811
Likes: 78
From: Howell, NJ
Default

It would probably wipe out the center diff if you tried any of that.
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2014 | 06:29 PM
  #4  
stb616's Avatar
Mudding
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 195
Likes: 7
Default

It might be the 1st time I've ever heard "burn out" used when referring to a rover.
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2014 | 08:14 PM
  #5  
Alex_M's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Camel Trophy
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 4,743
Likes: 985
From: Southwestern Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by Disco deuce
Yes, yes, in theory yes, theoretically it could work but a better option would be to use the lock on the t case, if you have one. Though you would destroy your brake shoes and more than like damage the rest of the vehicle.
I have a locking t-case, it's just not in the truck right now. I do plan to get that swapped relatively soon, however.
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2014 | 08:16 PM
  #6  
Alex_M's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Camel Trophy
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 4,743
Likes: 985
From: Southwestern Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by RoverMasterTech
It would probably wipe out the center diff if you tried any of that.
Really? Even just to drive w/o the rear shaft? How would it be any different than locking the t-case if it had a locker?
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2014 | 08:16 PM
  #7  
Alex_M's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Camel Trophy
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 4,743
Likes: 985
From: Southwestern Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by stb616
It might be the 1st time I've ever heard "burn out" used when referring to a rover.
Haha, an amusing idea isn't it? I just might try it with my parts truck if I can get it running.
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2014 | 08:29 PM
  #8  
lordmorpheus's Avatar
Pro Wrench
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 86
From: St Louis MO
Default

Originally Posted by Alex_M
Really? Even just to drive w/o the rear shaft? How would it be any different than locking the t-case if it had a locker?
Well, locking the transfer case causes the front and rear drive shafts to each get 50% of the power input from the transmission. With no rear axle, the rear output is just going to spin freely: No harm done.

Locking the rear output stationary with the parking brake, sending all of the power to the front axle, then put under strain of moving the vehicle is going to do bad things.

Imagine a rear wheel drive car from the 80's with an open rear differential. Lets say the right rear wheel is seized to the axle, so you put a dolly under that wheel, then drive the car using just the left wheel. I think that in just a few miles, that differential would explode under the strain.
 
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2014 | 10:02 AM
  #9  
Disco deuce's Avatar
Three Wheeling
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 77
Likes: 4
From: South Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by Alex_M
Haha, an amusing idea isn't it? I just might try it with my parts truck if I can get it running.
you're better of with a Nissan if you want to do burn outs...
 
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2014 | 09:49 PM
  #10  
Alex_M's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Camel Trophy
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 4,743
Likes: 985
From: Southwestern Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by lordmorpheus
Well, locking the transfer case causes the front and rear drive shafts to each get 50% of the power input from the transmission. With no rear axle, the rear output is just going to spin freely: No harm done.

Locking the rear output stationary with the parking brake, sending all of the power to the front axle, then put under strain of moving the vehicle is going to do bad things.

Imagine a rear wheel drive car from the 80's with an open rear differential. Lets say the right rear wheel is seized to the axle, so you put a dolly under that wheel, then drive the car using just the left wheel. I think that in just a few miles, that differential would explode under the strain.
Well, I understand what your saying, but loads of people have just locked the t-case and kept on a trucking when they lost or were about to lose and removed their front shaft. I'm not saying your wrong, im just saying I've never seen anything to back up your claim on these trucks.

Edit: Oh! I understand what you're saying! I didn't even think about that. I would assume it would be fine as a short term solution if you were easy on the gas, but I understand your point and agree fully. Thank you for pointing that out.
 

Last edited by Alex_M; Oct 14, 2014 at 09:53 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:09 AM.