Discovery II Talk about the Land Rover Discovery II within.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Sure do love our Discos, but…

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 03-10-2022, 02:00 PM
greisinb's Avatar
Recovery Vehicle
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Kitsap County, WA
Posts: 886
Received 353 Likes on 227 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sqlbullet
Maybe to swing this back around to the original question, at least how I interpreted it...How can we keep the operating costs/TCO down on our Disco?
Well, the good thing about having such cruddy fuel economy to begin with is that it doesn't take much to improve it by 10% and offset gas prices rising 10%! If it's been a while since you've changed our the front o2 sensors that's where I would start looking for "free" fuel economy. O2 sensors read "lean" as they age causing the computer to inject more fuel than required. The computer won't throw a code until your long term fuel trim is over 10%. The front sensors are easy to change and honestly, if you get a reasonable bump in fuel economy it won't take long to offset the purchase price, especially if you drive your truck with any regularity or over distance.

Storytime: 2 years back I took my truck on a trip from Seattle to Montana and it threw a long term code just outside of Spokane- I spent the rest of the trip getting 8MPG, swapped out the front o2 sensors the moment I got home and codes went away and my MPG went back up to its normal 13-14. I wish I had the time/opportunity to get them swapped out in a shop along the way, even paying someone to do it I probably would have came out ahead for fuel cost, of course this was back at the start of COVID when gas prices were super low because no one was commuting.
 
  #32  
Old 03-10-2022, 06:04 PM
sqlbullet's Avatar
Mudding
Join Date: Feb 2022
Posts: 166
Received 68 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Set of front O2 sensors will run you about $50 at rockauto. I didn't buy to improve fuel economy, but I did take deliver on a pair two days ago. A 10% bump in economy at my local fuel prices would pay for the sensors before you next oil change - 1800 miles by my math. It would save you about 2.7¢/mile. Even a 5% bump pays back in 3500 miles (1.5¢/mile).

Oh, and the above numbers assume your "bad" economy is 14 mpg. Fuelly says 13 for Disco 2 V8, so the return will be a bit faster.

Good call out!
 
  #33  
Old 03-10-2022, 10:52 PM
T-rex's Avatar
Mudding
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Logan, Utah
Posts: 249
Received 160 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cvhyatt
T-Rex - Buck the trend like me. I am driving across country from Florida to Moab on Friday - gas prices be damned! Care to join me on the trail?
I'm super tempted. I'd like to go south and get out of this cold weather.

I did this today:


 
  #34  
Old 03-11-2022, 05:53 AM
Join Date: May 2011
Location: kitchener, canada
Posts: 2,752
Received 393 Likes on 306 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by greisinb
Well, the good thing about having such cruddy fuel economy to begin with is that it doesn't take much to improve it by 10% and offset gas prices rising 10%! If it's been a while since you've changed our the front o2 sensors that's where I would start looking for "free" fuel economy. O2 sensors read "lean" as they age causing the computer to inject more fuel than required. The computer won't throw a code until your long term fuel trim is over 10%. The front sensors are easy to change and honestly, if you get a reasonable bump in fuel economy it won't take long to offset the purchase price, especially if you drive your truck with any regularity or over distance.

Storytime: 2 years back I took my truck on a trip from Seattle to Montana and it threw a long term code just outside of Spokane- I spent the rest of the trip getting 8MPG, swapped out the front o2 sensors the moment I got home and codes went away and my MPG went back up to its normal 13-14. I wish I had the time/opportunity to get them swapped out in a shop along the way, even paying someone to do it I probably would have came out ahead for fuel cost, of course this was back at the start of COVID when gas prices were super low because no one was commuting.

there are a few members here that dont even run o2 sensors, i doubt you will get 10 % more fuel economy, ask extinct how many mpg he gets, he runs with no o2 lol
 
  #35  
Old 03-11-2022, 08:05 AM
greisinb's Avatar
Recovery Vehicle
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Kitsap County, WA
Posts: 886
Received 353 Likes on 227 Posts
Default

How do you (and why would you) not run upstream o2 sensors? They would seem to be a pretty crucial and imbedded part of the engine management system.
 
  #36  
Old 03-11-2022, 09:33 AM
Best4x4's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Beaumont, TX
Posts: 7,715
Received 2,272 Likes on 1,676 Posts
Default

My 97 XD has no cats & rarely ever tosses a code for O2 sensors unless I am at idle for extended periods of time out on the trail. The 95 D1 with just 2 O2 sensors could care less and it's also running without cats. Crawl under either of them & nothing to steal from me!! Both D1's average 10-13mpg and only the 95 is running 93 octane fuel.
 
  #37  
Old 03-11-2022, 03:34 PM
Extinct's Avatar
Camel Trophy
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Lynchburg VA
Posts: 4,443
Received 1,462 Likes on 1,038 Posts
Default

I have a 2000 with four dead 02's, been running it like that for two years, gets 17mpg consistently on stock size Michelins at 75 mph. ECU defaults to MAF fueling when the sensors are completely dead. I did a post a while back showing the data from my code reader. South African trucks had no cats because they had leaded fuel, no 02's. Not sure how but would be interesting flash that program in.

Unplug both front and rear 02's and see how it runs, runs just fine.
 
  #38  
Old 03-11-2022, 04:08 PM
greisinb's Avatar
Recovery Vehicle
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Kitsap County, WA
Posts: 886
Received 353 Likes on 227 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Extinct
I have a 2000 with four dead 02's, been running it like that for two years, gets 17mpg consistently on stock size Michelins at 75 mph. ECU defaults to MAF fueling when the sensors are completely dead. I did a post a while back showing the data from my code reader. South African trucks had no cats because they had leaded fuel, no 02's. Not sure how but would be interesting flash that program in.

Unplug both front and rear 02's and see how it runs, runs just fine.
That's actually kind of fascinating. Does it throw codes/CEL with no sensors? It seems it would.
 
  #39  
Old 03-11-2022, 06:58 PM
Extinct's Avatar
Camel Trophy
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Lynchburg VA
Posts: 4,443
Received 1,462 Likes on 1,038 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by greisinb
That's actually kind of fascinating. Does it throw codes/CEL with no sensors? It seems it would.
Yes of course it does. I ignore it. Shoemakers shoes...
 
The following users liked this post:
greisinb (03-12-2022)
  #40  
Old 03-12-2022, 06:47 AM
stillruns's Avatar
Pro Wrench
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Bham
Posts: 1,979
Received 390 Likes on 317 Posts
Default

So the lesson today is that, we don't really need the o2 sensors.

Headed down to the basement now to rip all mine out. Hoping it will make the truck lighter and get better gas mileage Kidding, but this is fascinating. I always thought they had to have them or otherwise they would run awful and stall the truck.
 


Quick Reply: Sure do love our Discos, but…



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:02 PM.