LR2 Talk about the Land Rover LR2 within.

Fuel Grade for the LR2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 03-11-2014, 07:09 AM
roverguy7's Avatar
Pro Wrench
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

I personally recommend 5k miles on all of these vehicles, be it with synthetic or conventional. Not due to the oil breaking down, or not being able to properly lubricate, but to keep it clean. The less contaminants(the stuff that turns it black after time) the less build up you will get. This becomes more of an issue in the +05 vehicles that have over active PCV systems.

My recommendation for synthetic vs conventional is based solely on driving style, and conditions.
 
  #12  
Old 05-06-2014, 05:11 PM
merlinj79's Avatar
Winching
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 680
Likes: 0
Received 261 Likes on 198 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by roverguy7
I personally recommend 5k miles on all of these vehicles, be it with synthetic or conventional. Not due to the oil breaking down, or not being able to properly lubricate, but to keep it clean. The less contaminants(the stuff that turns it black after time) the less build up you will get. This becomes more of an issue in the +05 vehicles that have over active PCV systems.

My recommendation for synthetic vs conventional is based solely on driving style, and conditions.
My understanding...

The oil doesn't break down...ever. It does get contaminated and worse, modern oil grade specs have gradually reduced certain "consumable" anti-wear additives (due to emissions requirements). You're likely to use up your additives before the oil gets dirty.

The benefit of synthetic is generally better "extreme" wear protection during high-stress operations (cold start, WOT, sudden rpm changes, etc). The base oil stock doesn't last longer than dino oil...they all last forever, unless perhaps exposed to extreme conditions which would destroy the engine anyway.

Given the cost of LR parts and service (and the apparent likely hood of the dealer screwing it up) I baby the thing. Premium gas and somewhat shorter than recommenced oil intervals.

Engines which specify premium usually mean it...it's not a power thing but an engine-damage thing. High-compression engines will knock sooner on low-octane fuel. Actually modern engines *should* have a knock sensor that will adjust the timing to eliminate knock but this will reduce power and you're obviously getting at least a little knock before the sensor dials it back. Any knock is bad, I've heard of engines which were susceptible to knock damage because the sensor system didn't respond very quickly.

There is a difference between Euro and US octane ratings, but you can tell which is which by the reading the manual or the label on the filler.
 
  #13  
Old 05-07-2014, 05:59 AM
rightcoast's Avatar
3rd Gear
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: East coast Canada
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Test reslts are in.

Well, I have done the 87 vs 91 octane (here in Canada) test, and can report, that my LR2 SE gets average 12.5 with 87 and 10.2 with 91. If I am just highway driving @ 100-110 (whicj it seems to like best) the 91 numbers improve to 9.3-9.8 . Not bad for a heavy inline 6 banger eh?

So in conclusion, any percieved savings in fuel costs, for me, are cancled out by better mileage.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
toofaroffroad
Discovery II
6
03-21-2014 05:56 AM
Francopacks
Discovery II
2
08-10-2012 08:39 PM
ShadowMerchantBC
Discovery I
71
06-07-2011 10:59 PM
luxury1
General Range Rover Discussion - Archived
0
12-22-2008 07:33 PM
disco1
Discovery II
5
11-21-2005 10:19 PM



Quick Reply: Fuel Grade for the LR2



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:47 PM.