Discovery I Talk about the Land Rover Discovery Series I within.

bogs down on the grades?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 5, 2012 | 11:49 AM
  #11  
binvanna's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Winching
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 676
Likes: 43
Default

The ratios are about right if you also need to cruise the Interstates. Lower ratios can put you in the powerband, but I think you have to look at 4th gear engine speed at 80mph. At 80 in 4th, my engine's at 3000rpm. Regearing might bring it up another 400rpm or so which is pretty high to be holding for hundreds of Interstate miles. I think I need to check out the kickdown cable. That's probably the fix for my case.
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2012 | 12:08 PM
  #12  
Savannah Buzz's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 16,322
Likes: 88
From: Savannah Georgia
Default

hmmm.. think the TPS sensor is telling the CPU the correct throttle angle at that end of the range? That is part of the calculation for wider injector pules (mo gas please). Would show up as throttle angle % on scanner not changing beyond a certain position. Base idle is like 9%.
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2012 | 01:05 PM
  #13  
EricTyrrell's Avatar
Pro Wrench
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 18
From: Oregon
Default

Originally Posted by binvanna
So they don't perform stoichiometrics and result in changes in the air/fuel ratio on a GEMS equipped vehicle? That would mean you could remove the cats and rear O2 sensors and there'd be no change in running, just ODBII codes for the AWAL sensors. There'd be no need for "O2 sensor simulators" or anything like that to get correct ratios, just to stop the codes which can also be ignored. That's the way the old carburretor-equipped cars were, with no sensors.

I don't intend to remove the cats unless I can confirm they're bad. I actually doubt they are. I just wish it was easier to confirm they're clear.
Correct. They're only for CAT performance verification. Only the two upstream sensors affect air/fuel ratio. Many have been running without downstream O2 sensors or CATs for years, including myself.

80mph is high speed for a disco. It's difficult to maintain that speed as inefficient as its aerodynamics are in addition to traveling up hill. If you want more power without gearing changes then you could add a supercharger, Tornado chip, performance cam, or 4.6 engine swap.
 
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2012 | 02:02 PM
  #14  
binvanna's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Winching
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 676
Likes: 43
Default

I tightened my kickdown cable and found my performance on the grade is not bad enough to indicate clogged cats.

I overadjusted the kickdown cable at first which resulted in very easy downshifts or double-downshifts (4th to 2nd) but it also caused the transmission to clunk a hard upshift almost everytime I let off the gas. So I backed it off a bit and it's working ok. The upshift clunking is noticeable only when I really cut off the gas pedal abruptly.

Paying more attention to it, I noticed the transmission isn't the smoothest but it's still comparable to a typical TH350... just not as smooth as a modern auto.

On the grade, I am getting up to 75mph now with the kickdown working. At that point I am hitting a HP limit, but I think it's making good power for what it is supposed to be, you know with the lift, roof rack and everything.

I'm not trying to go faster. I just wanted to verify my cats aren't clogged and prevent getting rear-ended by a turbo diesel when I hit a grade, fail to downshift and slow to 50! At 3 gpm of $5 premium, I'd be content to slow down if it didn't mean getting creamed.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Newfoundlandrover
Discovery II
1
Oct 2, 2011 06:51 PM
giboulou13
General Range Rover Discussion - Archived
2
Nov 1, 2010 07:37 AM
boriswip
Engine & Internal
6
Jul 24, 2007 09:54 PM
boriswip
Freelander
4
Jan 20, 2007 07:13 PM
cmitty
General Range Rover Discussion - Archived
4
Dec 20, 2005 01:36 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 PM.