General Grabber AT2's in standard size of 255/55 R18, so far apart from really thick mud, there are REALLY good, and have not affectecd on road performance or MPG either. Highly recommend them tbh if you use your 18"'s

 

here are3 of the 5 im looking at. the other one has extensive service list. should i stay away from that? lol...

http://www.carfax.com/cfm/ccc_Displa...TY19444A854435

http://www.carfax.com/cfm/ccc_Displa...TY19404A853069

http://www.carfax.com/cfm/ccc_Displa...TY19434A847380

 

The third one is a lemon, walk away. It has had the engine replaed AND the head gaskets done on the new engine AND has had a window regulator replaced twice.

I dont like the second one either, it went to auction after only 10 days of sitting on the dealer lot, have to ask yourself why. Whats wrong with it?

Of the three the first one seems like the best bet.

 

Don't count the 2nd one out due to the short time to auction.Alot of dealers don't mess w/ them, especially if a new car trade. The dealer is in it at rough to average wholesale atmost. Theyshoot them thru the auction,and unless it is a piece of junk, will almost always get there trade value back usually more. These trucksdepreciateheavily on a monthly basis, and w/the recent $4 gasprices, it's not worth the risk.Cruzin

 

here's the latest one i checked. it said 2004 but date on the vin says 10/03. does that mean this is the 03? any d2 experts in the house? this is 8900 D2. lol.. i might be able to get this for 8k. depending on carfax results.

 

I have not looked at any pictures of this truck, but going buy the chassis number, I can tell you its a 4.6 HC engine, colour bonatti grey, leather seat trim, automatic, 5 seats, diff lock, rear coil suspensionand was built on 20th Oct 2003. So that nearly then end of 2003, so its highly likely by the time it was shipped over to the US, it was 04 before it was registered / sold.

under its spec codes I have its classed as a 2004 model year by Land Rover