Discovery II Talk about the Land Rover Discovery II within.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2002 vs. 2004 series ii

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 17, 2015 | 12:00 PM
  #1  
kevsauce1420's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
1st Gear
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Default 2002 vs. 2004 series ii

Hi All:


New to this site -- apologies if I'm posting in the wrong forum. I've been looking to purchase a used discovery series ii for quite some time, and have recently looked at 2 different vehicles that I'm considering purchasing. Their respective owners are asking roughly the same price, and both vehicles are in excellent condition, with clean titles, and no history of major repairs or incidents.


One is a 2002 discovery w/ 60k miles on it; the other is a 2004 discover with 80k miles.


Any thoughts on which would be preferable all else held equal? I'm leaning towards the 2002 with less miles, but am seeking some advice.


Thanks
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2015 | 12:05 PM
  #2  
jafir's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,847
Likes: 106
From: Arkansas
Default

Drive them both to get the engines good and warm and see if either one makes noise.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2015 | 12:17 PM
  #3  
bballjames's Avatar
Winching
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 742
Likes: 4
From: Las Vegas
Default

I would also check to see if one has had head gaskets done. The 60k one probably not, the 80k is a toss up. If neither one have had it done, be expecting to do it in the near future.

Another consideration is the 04 has the locking center differential from the factory. The 2002 would require a new transfer case if you want that.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2015 | 12:36 PM
  #4  
abran's Avatar
Baja
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,877
Likes: 786
From: Huntington Beach CA
Default

Records of service history are more important than mileage.

I personally prefer the 2004. But if you don't have a preference between the two years I would pick the one that has the best service history documented.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2015 | 05:01 PM
  #5  
OffroadFrance's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 5,845
Likes: 368
From: Near Bordeaux, France
Default

Originally Posted by abran
Records of service history are more important than mileage.

I personally prefer the 2004. But if you don't have a preference between the two years I would pick the one that has the best service history documented.
X1 defo service history and later model with reputable LR garage(s) is god. 20K miles is no big deal. Check the docs carefully and drive them both and get someone with knowledge of them to look them over unless you know LR's inside out.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2015 | 05:39 PM
  #6  
G150driver's Avatar
Mudding
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 245
Likes: 16
From: Denver, CO
Default

2002 has a 4.0L the 2004 has a 4.6L. I think most will agree that the 4.0L has a (slightly) better reputation. I'm not sure where you live, but here in Colorado the little extra grunt provided by the '03/'04's 4.6L engine is nice to have on some of the longer highway climbs.

60 to 80K you're definitely into head gasket time with either car. Also look for records that the front driveshaft has been cared for/overhauled. 60 to 80K is right around the range where the neglected units have the potential to turn into twirling masses of destruction capable of untold amounts of damage to both engine and transmission.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
inline6
Discovery II
5
Aug 27, 2007 04:47 PM
Rub
Discovery II
8
Feb 23, 2007 01:11 PM
AlexERAsDisco
General Tech Help
4
Dec 16, 2006 03:18 PM
McDougal
Discovery II
2
May 5, 2006 06:04 PM
95roverV8i
Discovery II
1
Mar 26, 2006 03:29 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 AM.