BIGGER SHOES
#1
#6
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
RE: BIGGER SHOES
Well, now you got me. Some guys on here are claiming hardly seing a difference in performance when running lifted Discos with 265/75-16 ????
I red that 245/75-16, would cause to cost 1/2 m.p.g and 265/75-16, 1 m.p.g
This guy is running 255/70-16 which is smaller than 245/75-16. how would it cost him 1 m.p.g or even a slight difference in performance????
I red that 245/75-16, would cause to cost 1/2 m.p.g and 265/75-16, 1 m.p.g
This guy is running 255/70-16 which is smaller than 245/75-16. how would it cost him 1 m.p.g or even a slight difference in performance????
#7
#8
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
RE: BIGGER SHOES
Actually Disco Mike, my goal was not to catch you in error. I'm just new to Rovers and am in the learning phase, in which I'll be for a long time considering the mountain of trouble that represents owning a LR. So when something does not corroborate stuff that I think I now know, I lift the flag in order to set things straight and move on to new stuff to learn.
Darover.
Darover.
#9
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post