Discovery II Talk about the Land Rover Discovery II within.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Do you like the new Discovery better than a DII?

Old Oct 8, 2016 | 02:06 PM
  #21  
stillruns's Avatar
Pro Wrench
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,992
Likes: 399
From: Bham
Default

Originally Posted by Robert Booth
i think you're trolling. Land Rover have been pretty clear about the naming conventions they're adopting going forward. Vehicle on the right is the new LR2/freelancer. The rebadged name establishes it as the "sport" model in the discovery line.

it should look similar to an Evoque given that it's the same car and drivetrain couple to a different body.

"new discovery" is the name JLR are applying to the D5/LR5. You won't see those on the road just yet.

Not sure why folks find this so hard to grok.
"LR2/freelancer"?...it says Discovery. JLR Should have just discontinued the Discovery line and kept the LR2 Freelander and RR models. Now they have a RR Sport, Evoque, new Discovery and LR2 Freelander which are essentially the same size, etc vehicle. Either way, beating a dead horse here. Glad to be the owner of a D1.
 

Last edited by stillruns; Oct 8, 2016 at 02:33 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2016 | 06:08 PM
  #22  
Robert Booth's Avatar
Recovery Vehicle
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 801
Likes: 84
From: Seattle, WA
Default

Originally Posted by stillruns
"LR2/freelancer"?...it says Discovery. JLR Should have just discontinued the Discovery line and kept the LR2 Freelander and RR models. Now they have a RR Sport, Evoque, new Discovery and LR2 Freelander which are essentially the same size, etc vehicle. Either way, beating a dead horse here. Glad to be the owner of a D1.
It says "Discovery Sport". It's the Ford 4 cylinder turbo, the evoque frame and new body with 5 + 2 seating and replaces the LR2.

Why would Land Rover discontinue Discovery? The Discovery 4 has been a massive sales success for the company, as will Discovery 5.

The best part of owning older Land Rovers is how passionate and friendly owners are. This elitist "your Land Rover isn't a REAL Land Rover" crap is worriesome.
 
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2016 | 07:28 PM
  #23  
stillruns's Avatar
Pro Wrench
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,992
Likes: 399
From: Bham
Default

Originally Posted by Robert Booth
It says "Discovery Sport". It's the Ford 4 cylinder turbo, the evoque frame and new body with 5 + 2 seating and replaces the LR2.

Why would Land Rover discontinue Discovery? The Discovery 4 has been a massive sales success for the company, as will Discovery 5.

The best part of owning older Land Rovers is how passionate and friendly owners are. This elitist "your Land Rover isn't a REAL Land Rover" crap is worriesome.
LR3,. LR4 is NOT Discovery in the US. LR dropped the name Discovery on purpose bc the Discovery had a bad reputation. Discovery only appeared on overseas versions. From 2005 until recently there wasn't a "Discovery" name here in the US, it has been LR3,4, and 5. Now, JLR has debuted a new Discovery except it isn't new at all. The new Discovery is a Ford Explorer. The Discovery Sport is the RR Evoque. They should continue on with LR4, 5..how ever far they want to go and not brought back "Discovery" in the US. I get it, really. They are appealing to young feminine males and highschool girls. Hey, money is money.
 
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2016 | 09:33 PM
  #24  
JUKE179r's Avatar
Camel Trophy
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,969
Likes: 859
From: Britainistan, UK
Default

Originally Posted by stillruns
One ugly cheap looking vehicle. New Discovery next to an even cheaper joke the RR Evoque.. Can you tell the two apart.
Being in Georgia it's rare, but cool, to see any Land Rovers driving around here. But still since we recently got back from Las Vegas, there were many newer Land Rovers to see up and down "The Strip". And I got to say they looked bloody horrendous! IMHO... All the newer LRs were ugly and were pimped out with 26" to 32" chrome rims and lo-pro tires.
Uuuuuuuuugh! I wanted to throw up.
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2016 | 08:03 AM
  #25  
Alex_M's Avatar
Camel Trophy
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 4,743
Likes: 985
From: Southwestern Virginia
Default

Do I love my d2? Yes, more than most people could understand.

Would I ever part with it for a newer model? No, I couldn't imagine it.

Do I think the new Discovery Sport should carry the Discovery name? No, it has none of the traditional Discovery styling ques.

Could it walk circles around a D2 in stock form on and off road? Yes. Period. There is no comparison, and saying it's not a real land rover is bullsh*t. In the 90s, I'm sure the series and defender guys said the same thing about the Discovery 1 and in the early 2000s about the Disco 2.
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2016 | 10:29 AM
  #26  
Kenso's Avatar
Mudding
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 140
Likes: 11
From: Wilmington NC
Default

I can see the new Discovery selling ok, it should appeal to MDX, X3/X5 owners etc. I would think a lot of current LR4 owners would be turned off by it's appearance though. Just a guess, I would assume current LR4 owners like it's distinctive styling and standing out from the crowd. I think JLR will make up for it by conquest sales to people currently owning other makes. Definitely not something I'd aspire to own, might have some decent specs but visually too unappealing/weak.
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2016 | 12:17 PM
  #27  
OffroadFrance's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 5,845
Likes: 368
From: Near Bordeaux, France
Default

It's a bit too much like the RR Evoque for my tastes and smallish inside but I'm sure it will appeal to some both in the UK and US, IMO it's very much a womans wheels like the Evoque.

I like the old D2 and the D4 (LR4) for their size and capabilities and especially the D2 for it's lesser 'trick' electronics.
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2016 | 12:29 PM
  #28  
The_OGCJR's Avatar
Recovery Vehicle
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 808
Likes: 172
From: austin texas
Default

I do NOT like the look of the new Discovery but I LOVE the look of my D2 and LIKE the LR3/4

I'd buy an LR4 in a heartbeat for a daily. My D2 will always be the off road and camping vehicle. Right now my D2 is my daily.
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2016 | 12:47 PM
  #29  
ArmyRover's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,388
Likes: 1,753
From: Augusta, GA
Default

Offroading D2, daily driving and light off road new Discovery
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2016 | 01:34 PM
  #30  
Best4x4's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 7,985
Likes: 2,497
From: Beaumont, TX
Default

I owned D1/D2's back when they were brand new. I bought them for their design, off road capability, and functionality.

I now own a LR3 and while the LR3 is extremely capable off road with it's very advanced ABS/TC and EAS setup, I find it is also it's weak link. If it's working properly it's great, but there are way to many electronics and in a Camel Trophy world those kind of things fail. Any LR3/LR4/RRS/RR, or this new Discovery with EAS on the bumpstops is as useful as a darn Yugo off road. The RRC/D1/D2 have a good amount of electronics as well vs Series I/II/III/Defender, but they don't drop to the ground with a can bus issue or eas fault!

I'd take any of my D1/D2's off road to a remote location any day vs my LR3. Just to many things to go wrong with the LR3. The D1/D2's aren't perfect but they can be setup with lockers that you control vs a computer, no EAS to fail, and way more accessories to bolt on vs the newer LR's.

Everything eventually softens up and LR's are no exception.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:15 PM.