General Tech Help Good at troubleshooting? Have a non specific issue? Discuss general tech topics here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

water port/jacket treatment/seal.....insight?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 15, 2015 | 09:47 AM
  #1  
dusty1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,794
Likes: 211
From: dallas texas
Default water port/jacket treatment/seal.....insight?

so from gpr=
"We also perform a high density thermal-ceramic flow through the coolant passages within the block which remedies the porosity issues that these engines are known for and makes the engine much more resilient to higher-than-normal temperatures. This coating is extremely reliable and durable and allows the engine to disperse heat in a much more efficient fashion. Due to its impressive resistance to corrosion and high hardness rating, this process is used in many of today’s high-performance applications. "
and cannibal=
Exclusive Engine Block Water Jacket Hot Seal Process & Final Pressure Test: Unique Pressure Flow Technology designed to safeguard Water Jacket Walls of block against micro-fissures


any info on this procedure? what exactly are they doing?

I have been conversing with Drow.. about a diy equation of the same. it seems quite feasible. simple hot tank pressurized circulation of a chemical solution. plenty of options of products to seal the porous jackets, but which is the better option? they all appear to be a ceramic based product.
I really want to know what these guys are doing. it seems like a ceramic seal process. hoping some of you know more details.
 
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2015 | 09:52 AM
  #2  
Shiftonthefly1's Avatar
Pro Wrench
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,900
Likes: 142
From: Las Vegas
Default

Why oh why can't someone just make a modern readily available cast iron block of this engine. Eliminate the quirky aluminum porosity issues. The sleeve issues. Sorry zero help. Carry on.
 
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2015 | 11:51 AM
  #3  
dusty1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,794
Likes: 211
From: dallas texas
Default

that would take all the fun out of it.
didn't gm dump the alloy design in '63, for cast iron buick v6? something about heat treatment process causing a rejection of iron sleeves.
good thing rover ironed out that problem
 
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2015 | 12:37 PM
  #4  
lordmorpheus's Avatar
Pro Wrench
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 86
From: St Louis MO
Default

Yeah. I think all Rover remembered when they came across the rejected GM design was...

...step 3: PROFIT!!!
 
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2015 | 05:58 AM
  #5  
drowssap's Avatar
Baja
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 9,298
Likes: 318
From: Boston Strong
Default

Buick used to cast the steel sleeves in place (costly), Rover knowing so much about aluminum changed the process to pressing the sleeves after. hense our problem.

have you ever asked why all the stuff on the other side of the pond is running 215 Buick blocks?

do you think they might have been the first to find that 3.5 would drop a sleeve right down onto the rod,
and while waiting for Rovers fix (putting a reveal on the bottom of the cylinders.)
they went to the tried and trued 215 which will easy take a.40 overbore.
 

Last edited by drowssap; Jan 16, 2015 at 09:15 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hyaena556
Retired - Private For Sale/Trade Classifieds
1
Sep 20, 2010 06:41 PM
Huckleberry77
Discovery II
3
Jul 29, 2009 08:25 PM
seamuspg
Discovery II
2
Feb 21, 2009 02:31 PM
csshank
LR3
13
Feb 7, 2008 03:25 PM
vwtech
Discovery II
3
Nov 8, 2007 07:43 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:56 PM.