2022 Defender orders taking place now
#1041
So sounds like this is a JLR marketing and brand management issue. Their overall sales model just seems outdated for 2021.
To address some of the concerns/points of interest you presented I would say the following:
If JLR has dealers who do not follow whatever requirements they have then that's on them to keep their dealership network "in line." Consumer should not be penalized because JLR wont regulate their dealers and implement safeguards to stop the situations you mentioned.
I don't know the ins and outs of the car business or have prior experience like I believe you do, but again these sales systems don't make sense in functional actuality in todays world. JLR should control pricing of their brand. Pricing in the auto industry is very murky and not clear to the consumer. Dealerships get incentives on top of the amount they sell over invoice which add another layer of complexity to the true cost the vehicle. This is a product of the manufactures production and supply levels. Again if we lived in a world where you could simply order your defender at a set price this would eliminate the typical auto transaction. This might upset the "wheelers and dealers" of the world but I think the majority of people hate car shopping due to the way dealership pricing structure works and how negotiating back and forth typically ensues.
I can understand your part about a dealership needing be proportioned to provide warranty service. I think that is reasonable. I think that if a dealer is selling a certain amount of vehicles a year then they need to meet a quota for staff for potential warranty work. JLR can improve their reliability and maybe those numbers can be a lower ratio? I mentioned in another thread that I think it would be great for all auto manufactures to have independent shops be certified to perform warranty work. Certain auto manufactures have body shops who get certified to meet the standards for body work repair.
In a FIFO sales system smaller dealerships would be in the same position as every other dealership. Their demand will be relatively lower, else while the playing field should be even? I also think a brand like JLR should be trying to sell whatever they can vs saying "sorry all out of defender allocation for the year, would you like a Evoque instead?". I don't think JLR is actually operating that way since they seem to be<!--td {border: 1px solid #ccc;}br {mso-data-placement:same-cell;}-->cannibalizing production of the lower selling units to build their more popular ones like the Defender.
I realize this is just me dreaming....
To address some of the concerns/points of interest you presented I would say the following:
If JLR has dealers who do not follow whatever requirements they have then that's on them to keep their dealership network "in line." Consumer should not be penalized because JLR wont regulate their dealers and implement safeguards to stop the situations you mentioned.
I don't know the ins and outs of the car business or have prior experience like I believe you do, but again these sales systems don't make sense in functional actuality in todays world. JLR should control pricing of their brand. Pricing in the auto industry is very murky and not clear to the consumer. Dealerships get incentives on top of the amount they sell over invoice which add another layer of complexity to the true cost the vehicle. This is a product of the manufactures production and supply levels. Again if we lived in a world where you could simply order your defender at a set price this would eliminate the typical auto transaction. This might upset the "wheelers and dealers" of the world but I think the majority of people hate car shopping due to the way dealership pricing structure works and how negotiating back and forth typically ensues.
I can understand your part about a dealership needing be proportioned to provide warranty service. I think that is reasonable. I think that if a dealer is selling a certain amount of vehicles a year then they need to meet a quota for staff for potential warranty work. JLR can improve their reliability and maybe those numbers can be a lower ratio? I mentioned in another thread that I think it would be great for all auto manufactures to have independent shops be certified to perform warranty work. Certain auto manufactures have body shops who get certified to meet the standards for body work repair.
In a FIFO sales system smaller dealerships would be in the same position as every other dealership. Their demand will be relatively lower, else while the playing field should be even? I also think a brand like JLR should be trying to sell whatever they can vs saying "sorry all out of defender allocation for the year, would you like a Evoque instead?". I don't think JLR is actually operating that way since they seem to be<!--td {border: 1px solid #ccc;}br {mso-data-placement:same-cell;}-->cannibalizing production of the lower selling units to build their more popular ones like the Defender.
I realize this is just me dreaming....
#1042
Drove my '22 Defender home this morning. Friday before Labor Day was not really my preferred travel time, but I left early and it wasn't TOO terrible. The new Defender made it much more tolerable! '22 pangea green / white top P400SE. Ebony interior with ebony headliner. Clearsight mirror, heated/cooled seats, off-road / advanced off-road packs, adaptive cruise. Came exactly as ordered!
The following users liked this post:
Ace7711 (09-06-2021)
#1043
So sounds like this is a JLR marketing and brand management issue. Their overall sales model just seems outdated for 2021.
To address some of the concerns/points of interest you presented I would say the following:
If JLR has dealers who do not follow whatever requirements they have then that's on them to keep their dealership network "in line." Consumer should not be penalized because JLR wont regulate their dealers and implement safeguards to stop the situations you mentioned.
I don't know the ins and outs of the car business or have prior experience like I believe you do, but again these sales systems don't make sense in functional actuality in todays world. JLR should control pricing of their brand. Pricing in the auto industry is very murky and not clear to the consumer. Dealerships get incentives on top of the amount they sell over invoice which add another layer of complexity to the true cost the vehicle. This is a product of the manufactures production and supply levels. Again if we lived in a world where you could simply order your defender at a set price this would eliminate the typical auto transaction. This might upset the "wheelers and dealers" of the world but I think the majority of people hate car shopping due to the way dealership pricing structure works and how negotiating back and forth typically ensues.
I can understand your part about a dealership needing be proportioned to provide warranty service. I think that is reasonable. I think that if a dealer is selling a certain amount of vehicles a year then they need to meet a quota for staff for potential warranty work. JLR can improve their reliability and maybe those numbers can be a lower ratio? I mentioned in another thread that I think it would be great for all auto manufactures to have independent shops be certified to perform warranty work. Certain auto manufactures have body shops who get certified to meet the standards for body work repair.
In a FIFO sales system smaller dealerships would be in the same position as every other dealership. Their demand will be relatively lower, else while the playing field should be even? I also think a brand like JLR should be trying to sell whatever they can vs saying "sorry all out of defender allocation for the year, would you like a Evoque instead?". I don't think JLR is actually operating that way since they seem to be cannibalizing production of the lower selling units to build their more popular ones like the Defender.
I realize this is just me dreaming....
edited for some formatting error
To address some of the concerns/points of interest you presented I would say the following:
If JLR has dealers who do not follow whatever requirements they have then that's on them to keep their dealership network "in line." Consumer should not be penalized because JLR wont regulate their dealers and implement safeguards to stop the situations you mentioned.
I don't know the ins and outs of the car business or have prior experience like I believe you do, but again these sales systems don't make sense in functional actuality in todays world. JLR should control pricing of their brand. Pricing in the auto industry is very murky and not clear to the consumer. Dealerships get incentives on top of the amount they sell over invoice which add another layer of complexity to the true cost the vehicle. This is a product of the manufactures production and supply levels. Again if we lived in a world where you could simply order your defender at a set price this would eliminate the typical auto transaction. This might upset the "wheelers and dealers" of the world but I think the majority of people hate car shopping due to the way dealership pricing structure works and how negotiating back and forth typically ensues.
I can understand your part about a dealership needing be proportioned to provide warranty service. I think that is reasonable. I think that if a dealer is selling a certain amount of vehicles a year then they need to meet a quota for staff for potential warranty work. JLR can improve their reliability and maybe those numbers can be a lower ratio? I mentioned in another thread that I think it would be great for all auto manufactures to have independent shops be certified to perform warranty work. Certain auto manufactures have body shops who get certified to meet the standards for body work repair.
In a FIFO sales system smaller dealerships would be in the same position as every other dealership. Their demand will be relatively lower, else while the playing field should be even? I also think a brand like JLR should be trying to sell whatever they can vs saying "sorry all out of defender allocation for the year, would you like a Evoque instead?". I don't think JLR is actually operating that way since they seem to be cannibalizing production of the lower selling units to build their more popular ones like the Defender.
I realize this is just me dreaming....
edited for some formatting error
I think there's also a good deal of "legacy" involved. Some of these dealer agreements are decades old and I'm not sure how possible it would be to try to upend the system with hundreds of independent franchises who probably wouldn't have any collective agreement whatsoever if they were brought together to renegotiate.
It's not ideal for consumers but the car industry has traditionally not given a damn about the buyer. Land Rover especially has a corporate culture that is very much not focused on the warm and fuzzy.
A lot "could' change. But it won't.
Last edited by _Allegedly; 09-04-2021 at 05:43 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Moretti (09-03-2021)
#1044
The following 4 users liked this post by GavinC:
#1046
#1047
I'm in Denver too, not sure why but I was thinking I saw another CO post that they dropped their car in Tacoma for delivery. Hopefully I'm wrong about that though! I'm with you, hopefully they drop it on the east coast. Mine was built last week, we will probably end up on the same ship if your build date holds!
Last edited by efear; 09-07-2021 at 04:48 PM.
#1048
#1049
Don't kick me out of the group I didn't order a Defender but rather a Range Rover Sport. I check this forum often for all the details and updates on shipping/tracking/delays and such. There is some really great info here. They are built in different factories so I'm sure a decent amount of this doesn't apply to me but it seems as though they are all shipped together from the same port. Are you working with LR Denver? LR Flatirons? As far as I know it was built with all my specs but again, different models/factories so that probably isn't much help to you.