4.0 vs 4.6
#1
#4
2004 will have the edge, as early model oil pump problems have been fixed by then. The block is essentially the same, the increased displacement was achieved with different connecting rods. Both suffer from Rover overheating, so run a 180F thermostat and an OBDII scanner for temp monitoring.
#5
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 25,707
Likes: 0
Received 103 Likes
on
85 Posts
The early oil pump issues only pertain to a specific vin range of 03's. Old Rover/Buick engines have had an issue with the oil pump gears spread across all years of production.
The 4.6 has a little more power but drops more sleeves and has the same possible head gasket failure.
What would you be using a Disco for, how mechanical are you and have you ever owned a 4 wheeler before.
My money is on a 4.0 for less issues even though it has a little less power then the 4.6.
The 4.6 has a little more power but drops more sleeves and has the same possible head gasket failure.
What would you be using a Disco for, how mechanical are you and have you ever owned a 4 wheeler before.
My money is on a 4.0 for less issues even though it has a little less power then the 4.6.
#6
#10
I cannot imagine they'd be that much lighter, the only significant differences are crankshafts, camshafts, pistons, and maybe rods. The longer stroke provided by the crank would probably mean it weighs more, but not much. The block is exactly the same from 4.0 to 4.6. The pistons probably are close in weight.