Discovery II Talk about the Land Rover Discovery II within.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

CEL = better MPG

Old Jan 4, 2009 | 04:29 PM
  #11  
Spike555's Avatar
Team Owner
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,212
Likes: 98
From: Grand Rapids MI
Default RE: CEL = better MPG

AK-A bad tune up will cause O2 codes. Since you installed new plugs and wires I am betting that those O2 codes will not come back.
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2009 | 04:30 PM
  #12  
Disco Mike's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 25,707
Likes: 107
From: Denver, Colorado
Default RE: CEL = better MPG


ORIGINAL: SDinDS

IIRC, when an O2 sensor fault is detected, the system runs rich.
YUP. and if you run too rich, for too long, there goes the cat.
Either excessive lean or rich and the end result is an extra, unneeded expense.
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2009 | 04:32 PM
  #13  
AK Rover's Avatar
TReK
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,740
Likes: 11
From: Soldotna, AK
Default RE: CEL = better MPG

That would be awesome if you're right Spike. I don't really want to lay out $500 for the 4 O2 sensors. Since I only drove the one Rover that I ended up buying I really had nothing to compare it to so I didn't even realize how rough it was idling until I started it up with the new plugs and wires.
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2009 | 04:52 PM
  #14  
Spike555's Avatar
Team Owner
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,212
Likes: 98
From: Grand Rapids MI
Default RE: CEL = better MPG

If your O2's really were bad then your MPG would suck.
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2009 | 05:01 PM
  #15  
SDinDS's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Winching
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 669
Likes: 9
From:
Default RE: CEL = better MPG

Catalytic converters.... O2 sensors.... EVAP system..... (sigh)..... maybe I'll go back to driving my old 72 Montego. Nothing like using a matchbook to adjust the points!!!
In the meantime, I'm gonna wipe the code and see if it comes back. Maybe it wasn't used to being out on the open road...
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2009 | 05:18 PM
  #16  
ryanD2's Avatar
Mudding
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: CEL = better MPG

the front 02's are the ones i would replace with any 02 fault with high milage 100k plus. the rear 02's are simply looking for a medium (about .45v) the front are making the call for the PCM about rich or lean and will wear out faster then the rear. ive never replaced bank 2 02's that were not working properly. might save you some bucks....
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2009 | 08:27 PM
  #17  
SDinDS's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Winching
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 669
Likes: 9
From:
Default RE: CEL = better MPG

Thanks for the info. I reset it and I'll be driving about 60 miles tomorrow so I'll see if it comes back on. If so then time for a new one. I'm sure after 10 years and 119kmi that something will wear out.

Eric
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Alex_M
Discovery II
16
Jan 14, 2015 05:26 PM
Disco03
Discovery II
2
Jun 4, 2009 04:29 PM
mlfore
Discovery II
12
Apr 8, 2008 03:38 PM
jmang
Discovery II
3
Oct 22, 2006 11:25 AM
Corsair33
Discovery II
4
Sep 1, 2006 12:13 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:56 PM.