Discovery II Talk about the Land Rover Discovery II within.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Hard start (warm only / not when cold)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 11, 2012 | 10:58 AM
  #1  
Antmen's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Rock Crawling
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 342
Likes: 4
From: North Jersey
Default Hard start (warm only / not when cold)

Similar issue to https://landroverforums.com/forum/di...h-issue-49903/ but I wanted to include additional info on my vehicle and things I've done, just in case I should be looking at something else besides the CPS:

My '04 DII w/ 116K just cranks and cranks when warm (short stop at the local store, for example) but starts right up when cold (sitting overnight or an hour or more.) I'm looking to replace the CPS anyway, because I don't know the history on it (I bought it 2 years ago w/ 87K or so on it.)

A couple of weeks ago, I replaced the Fuel Purge Valve. Went through the cycle and a few days ago, showed as "READY" per my OBDII scanner. Almost two years ago, I installed new 8mm Magnecor wires w/ Bosch Platinum +4's. For what it's worth, I also replaced both upstream O2 sensors and air filter. So, that was only about 20K miles ago.

I cleaned the positive battery post, but now - after reconnecting it - a few systems are "NOT READY" (I would think the ECM has a backup/memory in it in case of power loss. I guess not.) May or may not be related...

Here are the ones that are "NOT READY:"
  • Htd 02 Sensor (Oxygen Sensor, on the hand, shows as READY - was NOT READY just yesterday)
  • Secondary Air System
  • Evap System (Man, and I just went through this cycle - took about two weeks!)
  • Catalyst

No Codes, by the way.

Any ideas or am I on the right track w/ the CPS?
If so, I can pick on up at Autozone today *or* should I wait and just order it from Atlantic British?

-Anthony

P.S. Missed this forum! I really should stick around more - not just when there are issues.
 

Last edited by Antmen; Aug 12, 2012 at 09:07 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2012 | 04:55 PM
  #2  
Disco Mike's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 25,707
Likes: 107
From: Denver, Colorado
Default

Could be the cranks sensor, could be a failing fuel pump, this is the time of the year when the pumps get too hot and can't pump the proper pressure, especially if the tank is around a 1/4 full.
 
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2012 | 05:57 PM
  #3  
Savannah Buzz's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 16,322
Likes: 88
From: Savannah Georgia
Default

You can do a free test for crank sensor - when it acts up check for spark. No spark is often linked to bad CKP. You an also pour cold water on it an see if it resets. About $70 sensor.
 
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2012 | 04:35 PM
  #4  
Antmen's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Rock Crawling
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 342
Likes: 4
From: North Jersey
Default

Just replaced the CPS. Damn whoever designed the location of that harness/plug! 90% of the time was taken up trying to disconnect and reconnect it.

Started up. Drove her around till warm... parked... went into the store... came out and started right up warm. Awesome! Thanks!

Now, it seems like it's running TONS smoother now. Am I imagining this?

-Anthony
 
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2012 | 05:04 PM
  #5  
Spike555's Avatar
Team Owner
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,212
Likes: 98
From: Grand Rapids MI
Default

Originally Posted by Antmen
Just replaced the CPS. Damn whoever designed the location of that harness/plug! 90% of the time was taken up trying to disconnect and reconnect it.

Started up. Drove her around till warm... parked... went into the store... came out and started right up warm. Awesome! Thanks!

Now, it seems like it's running TONS smoother now. Am I imagining this?

-Anthony
I say no, because the CPS is what controls spark, if it is not working at 100% spark will not be 100%.
It is my opinion that the CPS on the DII should be replaced at every tune up because it is a common fail item and it controls the spark.
That is my opinion.
 
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2012 | 05:24 PM
  #6  
Savannah Buzz's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 16,322
Likes: 88
From: Savannah Georgia
Default

When you went in the store, you came out with a 12 pack, right? Or something stronger to toast your good fortune.
 
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2012 | 09:03 PM
  #7  
Antmen's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Rock Crawling
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 342
Likes: 4
From: North Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by Spike555
I say no, because the CPS is what controls spark, if it is not working at 100% spark will not be 100%.
It is my opinion that the CPS on the DII should be replaced at every tune up because it is a common fail item and it controls the spark.
That is my opinion.
Ha! Maybe that's because I'm the kind of person who swears the car is faster after a car wash.

In any case, went for a longer drive and started up again warm. So, i believe we're good. On to an oil change (overdue.)

Thanks again. Celebration indeed.
 
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2012 | 10:27 PM
  #8  
Savannah Buzz's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 16,322
Likes: 88
From: Savannah Georgia
Default

The CKP makes a signal pulse every 6 degrees of rotation (well, there is a space left for sync), so a sensor with metal filings on it would make pulses more erratic, as can one that is bent, etc. It is a coil of wire around a metal rod. So if it were failing, the pulses would be erratic, perhaps not as "crisp", so the ECU would do better with a new clean one. On the D1 with the reluctor tabs on a disk, a bent tab can throw things off as well. Pix of senor (thanks Eric), and a view of the reluctor disk it senses, and some pages on the sensor from Bosch.
 
Attached Thumbnails Hard start (warm only / not when cold)-ckp-sensor-internal.jpg   Hard start (warm only / not when cold)-d1-reluctor-ring-oil-pan.jpg  
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 07:38 AM
  #9  
Antmen's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Rock Crawling
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 342
Likes: 4
From: North Jersey
Default

Thanks for those pics and info. That's quite interesting.

To make replacement easier, I'm going to look into rewiring the location of the connector. My only concern is adding to much length - I'm wondering if that would increase the ohms (resistance) and therefore decrease the strength of the signal? I would do it buying a couple of those sensor and creating a coupler/extension of sorts. Just an idea, because man that connector is not in a place where anyone with decent sized forearms can reach it.

-Anthony
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
atikovi
Discovery II
9
Mar 27, 2016 09:05 PM
Maverick231
Forum Help & Suggestion Center
0
Jan 18, 2015 07:48 AM
snads
Discovery II
20
Dec 6, 2014 02:42 PM
edognight
Discovery I
7
Dec 2, 2014 01:55 PM
Darover
Discovery II
16
Aug 28, 2007 03:01 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:15 PM.