General Range Rover Discussion - Archived Archived threads for all Range Rover discussions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Cannot decide what to do

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 10, 2014 | 10:08 AM
  #1  
sbrodacz's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Drifting
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 32
Likes: 1
Default Cannot decide what to do

Maybe you guys can help. I am looking for a vehicle I can take my family camping with and off roading here and there. We are planning on going to the Silver lake sand dunes in MI before winter comes. I was leaning towards a discovery but the more research I do a lot of people suggest getting a P38 because it has more room and is extremely capable off road. I did have a 99 Range Rover many years ago and loved it. Am I better off going with the Range Rover over the Discovery? If so what years should I look for? I'd like to stay below 6k. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
 
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2014 | 08:57 AM
  #2  
Explorer0863's Avatar
Drifting
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Default

I do not own a P38, but I have have a 94 RRC LWB and 99 Disco2. Like any other vehicle, maintenance is extremely important specially with LRs. I do regular and preventative maintenance on my trucks and I find my RRC more reliable than my Disco. As a matter of fact, I like go to the forest and hit the trails and my go to vehicle is the RRC. Whatever you decide, you will be able to find one under $6K. Read this: https://landroverforums.com/forum/ra...wb-kids-68437/
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2014 | 07:50 AM
  #3  
sbrodacz's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Drifting
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 32
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Explorer0863
I do not own a P38, but I have have a 94 RRC LWB and 99 Disco2. Like any other vehicle, maintenance is extremely important specially with LRs. I do regular and preventative maintenance on my trucks and I find my RRC more reliable than my Disco. As a matter of fact, I like go to the forest and hit the trails and my go to vehicle is the RRC. Whatever you decide, you will be able to find one under $6K. Read this: https://landroverforums.com/forum/ra...wb-kids-68437/
Thanks! I am really starting to lean towards a rr. I'm not stuck on a p38. I just thought that might be the best option. Maybe not?
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2014 | 09:24 AM
  #4  
dusty1's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,794
Likes: 211
From: dallas texas
Default

I too am getting a rrc. I have been informed that the lwb rrc and p38 are the same size. Going with the rrc out of personal preference. I can fit my family in the d2se7, but the 2nd row is cramped. Car seat + child feet = bouncy driver seat. 3 rd kid on the way.
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2014 | 07:22 PM
  #5  
OffroadFrance's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 5,845
Likes: 368
From: Near Bordeaux, France
Default

Originally Posted by Explorer0863
I do not own a P38, but I have have a 94 RRC LWB and 99 Disco2. Like any other vehicle, maintenance is extremely important specially with LRs. I do regular and preventative maintenance on my trucks and I find my RRC more reliable than my Disco. As a matter of fact, I like go to the forest and hit the trails and my go to vehicle is the RRC. Whatever you decide, you will be able to find one under $6K. Read this: https://landroverforums.com/forum/ra...wb-kids-68437/
IMO you are right. The old RRC, I had an '82, with a 3.5 naturally aspirated engine on SU's. The original concept was far more reliable than the more modern 'trick' D2's and RR's, yep it was a bit sluggish and slow but you don't buy a RR as a replacement sports car. The RRC did exactly 'what it said on the tin'
. I liked the old Buick 5.25 sleeved down engine which was very understressed and in many ways by todays standards quite agricultural - but it worked fine. Now the problem with the later RR, RRS, D2's, LR3 and LR4 is that you know something will go wrong but when and there's nothing you can do when it does 'cos it's jam packed with electronic gizmos.

These days the LR's are built for the city slickers as Chelsea tractors or shopping trolleys and 99% never see a dirt road of go offroad apart from the grass car park at the horse races.
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2014 | 07:17 AM
  #6  
drowssap's Avatar
Baja
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 9,298
Likes: 318
From: Boston Strong
Default

a RRC has much less to go wrong with them, but to be used a camping vehicle the prices are getting pretty high.
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2014 | 07:39 AM
  #7  
sbrodacz's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Drifting
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 32
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by OffroadFrance
IMO you are right. The old RRC, I had an '82, with a 3.5 naturally aspirated engine on SU's. The original concept was far more reliable than the more modern 'trick' D2's and RR's, yep it was a bit sluggish and slow but you don't buy a RR as a replacement sports car. The RRC did exactly 'what it said on the tin'
. I liked the old Buick 5.25 sleeved down engine which was very understressed and in many ways by todays standards quite agricultural - but it worked fine. Now the problem with the later RR, RRS, D2's, LR3 and LR4 is that you know something will go wrong but when and there's nothing you can do when it does 'cos it's jam packed with electronic gizmos.

These days the LR's are built for the city slickers as Chelsea tractors or shopping trolleys and 99% never see a dirt road of go offroad apart from the grass car park at the horse races.
Are you saying a range rover Classic is the way to go?
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DooDer
Discovery II
10
Jan 3, 2010 11:38 AM
bus
Discovery II
16
Sep 19, 2009 03:08 AM
Kumba830
Discovery II
12
Dec 1, 2008 03:51 PM
chrisreese
Discovery II
6
May 26, 2007 07:57 AM
gsxlex
New Member Introduction
7
Apr 5, 2005 09:31 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:31 AM.