General Range Rover Discussion - Archived Archived threads for all Range Rover discussions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Info

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 8, 2008 | 10:57 PM
  #1  
mcol's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default Info

Well guys I've got a few newb questions for you. I am going to go look at a couple of RR sometime this week. 1 is a 1998 HSE the other is a 2004. 1: What kind of fuel economy am I looking at 2: How mechanically reliable are they(I've heard bad things on this subject) 3: What kind of life expectancy should I expect. I'm looking at these vehicles as a primary vehicle for daily driving and off roading in the mountains. Any info would really be a help.
Thanks
Jimmy
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2008 | 11:26 PM
  #2  
mlshelton's Avatar
Mudding
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Default RE: Info

I'm guessing you mean 04 HSE as well?

Always go for the newer one - especially if its your daily driver. Presumably there is a substantial price difference?
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2008 | 11:26 PM
  #3  
mcol's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default RE: Info

I don't know how much on the price but yes. I would assume almost 20k diff.
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 11:19 AM
  #4  
alsuch's Avatar
Drifting
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Default RE: Info

Just my opinion, but if this is going to be your primary transportation, I'd recommend finding a good deal on a certified 2004 - 2006 HSE, (or one that's available with an extended warranty as a minimum). In terms of reliability, it's kind of a crap shoot.Some folks are plagued with failures, others not as much, but the key is not to end up out on a limb financially keeping it on the road; there is not an inexpensive repair to be had.
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 12:36 PM
  #5  
roverguy7's Avatar
Pro Wrench
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 37
Default RE: Info

go with the 04. much more reliable, youll spend the difference in price keeping the 98 on the road within 2 years. plus youre looking at about 100 more hp and better fuel milage with the 04, not to mention its a much nicer and smoother ride.
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 04:14 PM
  #6  
mcol's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default RE: Info

Well the 04 is gone. the 98 is still there I went and looked at it today and it seems a little rough around the edges. So I begining to gather that the mechanical reliabilty on this thing is going to be a little less than stellar. What kind of MPG would it get?
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 09:23 PM
  #7  
roverguy7's Avatar
Pro Wrench
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 37
Default RE: Info

foot out of the gas youre looking tops of 16, you will have trouble with this car though, its 3 generations old, not a very reliable engine managment system
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 07:34 PM
  #8  
lrobin3w's Avatar
Mudding
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 118
Likes: 2
From:
Default RE: Info

I seriously doubt you will spend "the difference" in 2 years buying the older range. the 98= 10 to 15K tops the 04 probably 45k.Thats$30k, alot of money!! The older range rovers are not any less reliable then the newer cars. The engine management system is very reliable. The problems usually asociated with the early (p38a) range rovers revolve around the air suspension system, which is prone to failure and expensive to repair.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CantAffordaRover
Defender
5
Dec 7, 2006 12:19 AM
rory2000
Off Topic
0
Jan 10, 2006 03:03 PM
thalpo
General Tech Help
1
Aug 8, 2005 01:55 PM
95countylwb
New Member Introduction
2
Jul 14, 2005 12:22 AM
neilp
Discovery II
0
Jan 3, 2005 04:47 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:58 PM.