Motor Mounts
I recently ordered a set of motor mounts for my 90 RRC. I got them from Miami British. Part number: KKB103120. Everyone I find online looks like that should be the right one. Mine have what looks like a 7/16 stud and the new ones have what looks like maybe half inch. The new studs wont fit through the mounting holes on the blovk or frame. He swears they should fit. I tried on both RRC'S I have at my house and neither will fit. They do however look like they would work on the transfercase. Those studs look bigger. Anyone else run into this? Is there two different mount part numbers?
As recommended ... but they didn't work , stick to OEM or certified after market replacement , when you start changing manufacture spec's , you are going to get problems long term ,
The LR engine mount was designed to minimise vibration transfer to the body .. each other part is also specially built for the active lifestyle Land Rover's have ...
so be careful about where you get your advise....
The LR engine mount was designed to minimise vibration transfer to the body .. each other part is also specially built for the active lifestyle Land Rover's have ...
so be careful about where you get your advise....
Part number for that year should be 566222 or STC434
The part number KKB103120 they gave you is for D1, not RRC. The part number I posted above is a part number for the RRC engine mount or the D1 trans mount.
The part number KKB103120 they gave you is for D1, not RRC. The part number I posted above is a part number for the RRC engine mount or the D1 trans mount.
Last edited by jafir; May 26, 2015 at 02:49 PM.
According to the info here: The number STC434 I gave you is M10 and the newer number KKB103120 is M12.
RovahFarm for all your new Land Rover Parts and Accessories
some stuff I've looked at suggests that some were 3/8" so I'm guessing that maybe the 566222 was imperial instead of metric. But that's just a guess.
RovahFarm for all your new Land Rover Parts and Accessories
some stuff I've looked at suggests that some were 3/8" so I'm guessing that maybe the 566222 was imperial instead of metric. But that's just a guess.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



