Discovery II Talk about the Land Rover Discovery II within.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

idiots quest for more power?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 4, 2014 | 04:19 PM
  #121  
dusty1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,794
Likes: 211
From: dallas texas
Default

Originally Posted by 04duxlr
The advantage of going directly to Crower is they will machine the snout to work in a motor without a distributor. Otherwise you will need to take it to a machine shop.
well that makes it a no brainer. thank you for that tid bit. direct it is
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2014 | 12:18 PM
  #122  
Dan7's Avatar
Recovery Vehicle
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 863
Likes: 18
Default

You're going to laugh, but NOS w/ a progressive controller may be the easy fix here. The part about NOS that blows up engines is the sudden shot of XXX hp. A progressive controller allows you to dial in the amount of power, and over what duration. So you could select a moderate 50 hp that gets delivered over 30 seconds...enough to get you accelerating up that hill. It's about $750 for the entire set up and requires little else, and works just as well on lower rpm engines.

Accepting spears now.
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2014 | 12:43 PM
  #123  
ls1morethanyou's Avatar
Winching
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 717
Likes: 47
From: Denton
Default

Originally Posted by Dan7
You're going to laugh, but NOS w/ a progressive controller may be the easy fix here. The part about NOS that blows up engines is the sudden shot of XXX hp. A progressive controller allows you to dial in the amount of power, and over what duration. So you could select a moderate 50 hp that gets delivered over 30 seconds...enough to get you accelerating up that hill. It's about $750 for the entire set up and requires little else, and works just as well on lower rpm engines.

Accepting spears now.
i wouldnt lol gotta keep a bottle warmer on if you want the correct pressure, then there is too much pressure- also this is what happens when you pill up




 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2014 | 01:59 PM
  #124  
dusty1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,794
Likes: 211
From: dallas texas
Default

Hmmmm
Researching. I've never messed with the stuff. Is it feasible to think that smaller gains would be reliably consistent? And Can I incorporate a switch into my hula girl?

And that looks pretty rough, lsJuan. What vehicle?
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2014 | 02:10 PM
  #125  
ls1morethanyou's Avatar
Winching
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 717
Likes: 47
From: Denton
Default

Originally Posted by dusty1
Hmmmm
Researching. I've never messed with the stuff. Is it feasible to think that smaller gains would be reliably consistent? And Can I incorporate a switch into my hula girl?

And that looks pretty rough, lsJuan. What vehicle?
That was the second motor in the GTO when i had it.
I would stay away, seen a 416 and a 447 stroker eat bearings cause of it, even being built as nitrous motors.

plus once it runs out you are still on a nitorus tune and it will lose power off it.
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2014 | 02:17 PM
  #126  
ls1morethanyou's Avatar
Winching
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 717
Likes: 47
From: Denton
Default

buddies 447, 30k worth of motor that ended up having to be "refreshed"
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2014 | 10:56 PM
  #127  
Dan7's Avatar
Recovery Vehicle
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 863
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by ls1morethanyou
That was the second motor in the GTO when i had it.
I would stay away, seen a 416 and a 447 stroker eat bearings cause of it, even being built as nitrous motors.

plus once it runs out you are still on a nitorus tune and it will lose power off it.
I doubt a 50 shot of NOS would require a tune, or would pose much danger. All your horror stories are minus a progressive controller. However, if it' still idiotic (I've never tried in this application), please reference title of thread.
 
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2014 | 09:07 AM
  #128  
ls1morethanyou's Avatar
Winching
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 717
Likes: 47
From: Denton
Default

Originally Posted by Dan7
I doubt a 50 shot of NOS would require a tune, or would pose much danger. All your horror stories are minus a progressive controller. However, if it' still idiotic (I've never tried in this application), please reference title of thread.
nope. that would be a progressive controller, this kit was on the 416 and 447 before it was on mine- though i will admit it was way more than a 50.
 
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2014 | 07:40 PM
  #129  
OffroadFrance's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 5,845
Likes: 368
From: Near Bordeaux, France
Default

I ran a 2.0 Ford Cosworth BDA on nitrous/methanol back in the 70's/80's. It was a bit unstable and the problem was that it required flushing out with petrol after every race otherwise it eat away the alloys and magnesium parts. It was great for extracting the final ounces of power but needed setting up properly to run on the stuff as a naturally aspirated engine running on Webber carbs with electronic ignition back then caused many other headaches. I can imagine it's even worse on injection.

The worst point was the safety aspect, you couldn't see it burn and even worse the marshals couldn't see it alight so you had to have special decals declaring you ran nitrous/methanol and carry an automatic water deluge system onboard or get cooked alive. Many historical cars today, hybrids, still use it along with superchargers.
 
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2014 | 09:08 PM
  #130  
04duxlr's Avatar
Pro Wrench
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 32
From: Duxbury MA
Default

That does sound like fun. Invisible flames and corroded engine internals. You can run around the track in your underwear like Ricky Bobby.

All nitrous does is give you more oxygen to burn more fuel. The problem with trying to add power with it as I understand it is that the nitrous and the additional fuel needs to be added very uniformly in order to avoid disaster. If you are running a full on race motor and you can dump in lots of nitrous and lots of fuel into a manifold that has a large volume of air flowing at high velocity then it gets pretty well distributed but to add a small amount of nitrous and fuel into a motor operating at part throttle you won't necessarily get the same positive outcome.

Maybe a nice direct port system: Nitrous Systems - Direct Port Nitrous Systems - Edelbrock, LLC.
You could plumb it in below the manifold in the valley. Add some higher flow injectors and then watch the check engine light do its thing while the driveline tears itself apart.

I really have to wonder just what is going on with the engine you have. I have a 4.6 in mine with stock gears and 32 inch tires and I'm never feeling like I need more power. For what it is, my truck does just fine. I'd be willing to bet that a 4.6 with a cam that isn't worn out would be sufficient for your needs. Not to say I'm not anxious to see how all your proposed improvements work out but I wouldn't look to build something that is on the verge of blowing up all of the time.

A 4.6 with a decent valve job, port and polish, extrude hone of the manifolds (Extrude Honing | Powder Coating, Ceramic Coating and Abrasive Blasting Specialists), properly cleaned and operating fuel injectors, headers possibly, higher flow cats and mufflers, your bigger cam and rhoads lifters should make for a reliable, capable engine. With that setup you should be able to get yourself thoroughly mired in a Texas mud hole at some Rover event.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:12 AM.