Land Rover Forums - Land Rover Enthusiast Forum

Discovery II Talk about the Land Rover Discovery II within.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

idiots quest for more power?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 10-25-2014 | 10:59 AM
dusty1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,794
Likes: 210
From: dallas texas
Default
so it be looking fosho
-crower 229
-.0 pistons
-a lot of p&p
- dumping any of the belted hp parasites that i can....fan, water pump....if only i could figure out a retrofit electronic power pas system
-free up exhaust flow
 
Last edited by dusty1; 10-25-2014 at 11:02 AM.
Reply Like
  #22  
Old 10-25-2014 | 11:03 AM
RicketyTick's Avatar
Recovery Vehicle
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 24
Default
Rhoads lifters maybe?
 
Reply Like
  #23  
Old 10-25-2014 | 01:19 PM
Alex_M's Avatar
Camel Trophy
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 4,734
Likes: 971
From: Southwestern Virginia
Default
Originally Posted by dusty1
it would appear that the lack of carburetor and control of timing via dizzy would diminish the reward of a supercharger on these. outside of the Cameron concept rr sse, any other supercharged set ups that were offered? just on the jag, right?


looking like supercharger is more trouble that it would be worth unless I am missing something. so i feel like that avenue probably not the one i should take.
any mind changing evidence out there?
Hmm, didn't know any of that. Like I said, just something I read once before and it's been a while. Sounds like it would be better to stay naturally aspirated. Bummer, superchargers and turbos are fun!
 
Reply Like
  #24  
Old 10-25-2014 | 01:20 PM
Alex_M's Avatar
Camel Trophy
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 4,734
Likes: 971
From: Southwestern Virginia
Default
Originally Posted by RicketyTick
Rhoads lifters maybe?
I wouldn't recommend anything different. Love mine.
 
Reply Like
  #25  
Old 10-25-2014 | 02:34 PM
dusty1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,794
Likes: 210
From: dallas texas
Default
How bout noise with the rhoads.
Liking the info about performance
 
Reply Like
  #26  
Old 10-25-2014 | 04:36 PM
Alex_M's Avatar
Camel Trophy
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 4,734
Likes: 971
From: Southwestern Virginia
Default
Originally Posted by dusty1
How bout noise with the rhoads.
Liking the info about performance
They are a bit noisy, but its not bad. It reminds me of the sound of a small diesel engine actually.
 
Reply Like
  #27  
Old 10-25-2014 | 05:40 PM
ArmyRover's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,060
Likes: 1,599
From: Augusta, GA
Default
Dusty so are you sticking with the 4.0 internals or are you looking at adding the 4.6 crank and rods? Displacement never hurts power production.
 
Reply Like
  #28  
Old 10-25-2014 | 05:45 PM
Alex_M's Avatar
Camel Trophy
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 4,734
Likes: 971
From: Southwestern Virginia
Default
Originally Posted by ArmyRover
Dusty so are you sticking with the 4.0 internals or are you looking at adding the 4.6 crank and rods? Displacement never hurts power production.
Personally, there is no way I would keep the 4.0 internals I'd I was tearing it down that far.
 
Reply Like
  #29  
Old 10-25-2014 | 08:39 PM
dusty1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,794
Likes: 210
From: dallas texas
Default
4.6
My block/engine staying in place. Till this one ready to stick in
 
Reply Like
  #30  
Old 10-25-2014 | 08:51 PM
ArmyRover's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,060
Likes: 1,599
From: Augusta, GA
Default
Originally Posted by Alex_M
Personally, there is no way I would keep the 4.0 internals I'd I was tearing it down that far.
Me either, no way I wouldn't beef that part up.



Good to hear your on the same page Dusty
 
Reply Like



Advanced Search

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20 PM.