Discovery I Talk about the Land Rover Discovery Series I within.

Codes 1193, 1187 & 1316

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 07-03-2012, 08:43 AM
Maytag's Avatar
Drifting
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Disco Mike
You are now not driving everything, but a Rover that has 2 tags stating Premium only as in 91 and above which I would suggest you run till you fix your trucks issues.
How many miles on the truck, if over 100,000 miles, I would suggest you replace all 4 04's and the ones for the advanced emission system, which your's has, are not cheap.
Find the exact part numbers and then do a search on Google for the best price.
In the mean time, no water down the intake.
Disco Mike... thanks dood.
Nearly every vehicle I've owned since 1989 (when I bought my first LT1) has had tags stating "Premium Fuel Only". But nearly NONE of them have actually required it. (including but not limited to the current rides: a V8 Benz and a Jag X) This is especially true at this elevation. So teach me: does this one really require premium? Or are you trying to remove variables to help troubleshoot the problems?

Either way, I'm listening. I have very little Rover-Specific experience, so I'm trying to be like a sponge here.

But: I've built and driven and dyno'd and raced waay too many motors in the last 4 decades to think that I should just throw my money at premium because there's a sticker that says so. A fact of combustion is that the lower your octane rating, the more complete your combustion will be in a fixed amount of time (with some variables that can change things, of course). So teach me why You are suggesting premium in this one, 'cuz I'll listen.

And nobody suggested water down the intake. the suggestion was made to remove the 'Y' pipe and run water down the exhaust. But I can see how my use of "throat" threw ya off!
 
  #12  
Old 07-03-2012, 08:51 AM
Disco Mike's Avatar
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 25,707
Likes: 0
Received 103 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

One reason for the higher octane has been to prevent or hold to a minimum the build up of carbon and in our heads/valves, it can be a big issue.
The other of course is you will get a little more low end torque and around 1 MPG improvement with 91. I did have an opportunity to run a couple tanks of 93 and boy was that an eye opener, that really woke up my 51 year old Buick engine in my 99 D2.
Might want to look at my major service list posted at the top of this section as a guide to make sure your truck is current, also are you familiar with our front drive shaft issues? When you get a chance crawl under and see if you have 1 grease fitting on each of your 3 front u-joints.
 
  #13  
Old 07-05-2012, 04:34 PM
Maytag's Avatar
Drifting
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

allright!
I received my ultragauge in the mail an hour ago. After going through the setup on it, I've got 'er up-n-runnin', and looks like some good info.
So, obviously there's something very different about the O2 readings on L/bank vs R/bank.
Which ones look like they'd be correct? what range should these be in?
And it appears I'm in "Open Loop" mode. IS this BECAUSE of the O2 readings? Or causal somehow?

 
  #14  
Old 07-21-2012, 05:00 PM
Maytag's Avatar
Drifting
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I replaced the 2 front o2 sensors, and it's still popping an 1187. I don;t get that.

anyone? anyone?

grumblegrumblegrumble...
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
csp
Discovery I
2
07-01-2013 07:33 AM
Shawn Cross
Discovery I
3
12-21-2012 07:17 PM
fishEH
Discovery I
3
10-25-2012 01:42 PM
gRover Cleveland
Discovery I
21
07-16-2012 09:29 PM
wolfgang528
Defender
0
12-28-2010 04:25 PM



Quick Reply: Codes 1193, 1187 & 1316



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:03 PM.