GPM flow of water pump?
Stupid question.
The manual says 2.64 gallons per minute @ 1,000 rpm.
Is it safe to assume then, that the GPM reach 13.2 GPM @ 5,000 rpm? Or would the radiator restrict flow?
I'm looking to plumb in a heat exchanger for hot water and need to spec it correctly to not restrict flow.
The manual says 2.64 gallons per minute @ 1,000 rpm.
Is it safe to assume then, that the GPM reach 13.2 GPM @ 5,000 rpm? Or would the radiator restrict flow?
I'm looking to plumb in a heat exchanger for hot water and need to spec it correctly to not restrict flow.
No, because restrictions increase as speed increases.
Just dead reckoning, I'd cut that number in half and then over-spec the exchanger a little. Maybe for 8 gal
What's the heat exchanger for out of curiosity?
Just dead reckoning, I'd cut that number in half and then over-spec the exchanger a little. Maybe for 8 gal
What's the heat exchanger for out of curiosity?
Last edited by Alex_M; Jul 15, 2017 at 02:48 PM.
Yes, definitely parasitic losses due to drag and obstruction. It might not be half, however, I agree with Alex's recommendation to assume half. It should be about spot on, or slightly off in your favor, for your calculations.
Perfect, the 10 plate heat exchanger will do, then. B3-12A 10 Plate Heat Exchanger with M5-.08 Mounting Studs [HX1210] | DudaDiesel Biodiesel Supplies
It's rated for 6 gpm without restricting PSI.
I'm hooking up an onboard water/shower system
edit: fridaynight, I think that could cause in increase in pressure (puts more stress on the coolant cap), and of course increase in coolant temp
It's rated for 6 gpm without restricting PSI.
I'm hooking up an onboard water/shower system

edit: fridaynight, I think that could cause in increase in pressure (puts more stress on the coolant cap), and of course increase in coolant temp
Last edited by Jeff Blake; Jul 15, 2017 at 03:31 PM.
no, that won't cause any flow issues since its not a part of the main path.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



