Discovery II Talk about the Land Rover Discovery II within.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Shopping for a D2 but should I go for a LR3?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 10-03-2016, 03:15 AM
MrWesson's Avatar
Mudding
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 147
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Robert Booth
Prediction:
In 10 years tone people will be talking about the D3 and D4 body style as "classic", "rugged", "iconic" and "last of its type"

The D2 was such a reliability nightmare in the USA that JLR had to retire the brand name for a whole generation. Its ok that we look on these vehicles fondly and with rose tinted spectacles. I truly get it, we're enthusiasts.

Poor gas mileage, poor driver crash protection and questionable build quality with electronics stashed in questionable locations for those who wanted to attempt water crossings. As a daily driver, the D3 or D4 is a much better choice. As a dedicated off-road /trail truck, a coil sprung Range Rover classic SWB or D1 eats the longer D2's lunch and there are less electronics to fry.

Replying to a thread from 2013 to bash on the D2?

The almost dozen posts before you didn't say what you did?
 
  #32  
Old 10-03-2016, 08:06 AM
Best4x4's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Beaumont, TX
Posts: 7,715
Received 2,272 Likes on 1,676 Posts
Default

Talking about the "Discovery" name changing to LR3 is funny since the LR3's name changed to LR4......

I have owned LR models from 1994 to 2006 and sorry my D1/D2's vs my LR3 are much easier to work on, easier to get parts locally, and the LR3 electronics are extremely complicated to diagnose without the proper scanner & lets not forget that Ford/Land Rover thought of such a brilliant location for the beer can enclosure aka TCM mounted outside of the interior with non water resistant harnesses or PCB protection of any kind....

The LR3 look has grown on me vs newer LR's but it is still very boxy to me. The D1/D2 have beautiful lines and an interior that still looks modern.
 
  #33  
Old 10-03-2016, 09:38 AM
Robert Booth's Avatar
Recovery Vehicle
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 801
Received 83 Likes on 70 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MrWesson
Replying to a thread from 2013 to bash on the D2?

The almost dozen posts before you didn't say what you did?
good catch on the date! My mistake. I read the forums on my phone while putting kids to bed. For some reason this thread popped up as being a "new post".

I still love my D2 for it's character but 4 years of daily driving my 04 leaves me under no illusions of how ill suited they are for the task in most respects.
 
  #34  
Old 10-06-2016, 09:04 PM
EstorilM's Avatar
Winching
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 685
Received 41 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

I don't know what everyone is arguing about - especially in the wake of the first new generation of "discovery" we've seen in 12+ years last week.

I think the new disco should humble us all, and allow us to realize just how far our vehicles have come.

The core design of these vehicles has changes VASTLY! People are just touting opinions left and right, but let's talk real-world for a second.

The Discovery II was a (fairly) refined live-axle vehicle on a ladder-frame chassis.

The Discovery 3 (ahem, another pet peeve on previous posts - it's the same name obviously, since it carried such overseas) has a FULLY INDEPENDENT double wishbone suspension built into a world-first hybrid ladder-frame/unibody "Integrated-Body-Frame / IBF" system LR designed.

INSTANTLY you're incapable of comparing the two. You're talking two entirely different generations of vehicle design. The ZF servotronic variable-ratio power steering is another example of vastly improved road dynamics.

I could keep going on, but mechnically-speaking the LR3+ is vastly superior in all aspects, especially the net result in driving dynamics and feel.

I love my DII still, but today it only "wins" battles due to its strengths, which is a timeless design, a (nearly) antique hora, its value (free now, only a few thousand bucks when I bought it 7+ years ago) and the fact that it's my LR3's baby brother. It's earned its' stripes though - I've towed boats hundreds of miles, driven through hurricane flood waters, etc etc.. always been amazing.

It was just dragged through a generation it didn't belong in at the end - probably stuck around 2-3 years longer than it should have. Meanwhile the LR3 was introducing things that wouldn't be seen by anyone else for 4-5 years. Fiberoptic multi-media networks? Terrain response? Factory four-corner air suspension? TWELVE years ago.

It's as ridiculous as trying to compare the new 2018 Discovery to the LR3 or LR4. Okay same engines, same 4 corner air suspension right? But new materials science and design has allowed a weight savings of almost a thousand pounds!!!!! Instantly they're non-comparable and in different leagues. You retain (and gain) some off-road capabilities, yet now you're competing with the Euro sport SUV segment (X5, Touareg, etc). Somehow they increased the stock wading depth by nearly a foot also!#@$%

That's just how it goes. You've gotta respect and honor the things your older vehicles stand for. It sure as hell isn't going to be winning a head-to-head battle with its own replacement - that's just kinda stupid. There are plenty of reasons why it remains special and valuable in its own way though...
 
  #35  
Old 10-08-2016, 08:31 AM
dgi 07's Avatar
Pro Wrench
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: People's Republic of New Jersey.
Posts: 1,570
Received 99 Likes on 92 Posts
Default

EstorilM , man they really got you riled up about this.
 
  #36  
Old 10-09-2016, 12:41 PM
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Near Bordeaux, France
Posts: 5,845
Received 368 Likes on 344 Posts
Default

IMO without a doubt the old D2 is more workable and more fun. I own both the D2 and the LR4 (D4) and both are diesels. The LR4 is a huge improvement over the LR3 which has many issues albeit superior to the D2 mechanically but I avoided being tempted into an LR3 (D3) having read many others ownership disasters. I am satisfied now with my 'stable' of cars and trucks which appear the best money can buy on my limited budget.
 
  #37  
Old 10-09-2016, 07:12 PM
TRIARII's Avatar
TReK
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,168
Received 86 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

When I buy a new to me vehicle there is no "should I buy this or should I buy that instead"... I follow my heart. I do ALOT of research on the vehicle make/model that Im most interested in. Then I familiarize myself with trim levels, special packages, recalls and known mechanical issues. Then when I find a vehicle make/model that has everything Im looking for I take it for a test drive. How does the car feel? How does it make me feel when I drive it? Does it make me smile? When I exit the vehicle do I turn around and give the vehicle another look and smile? If so then I found the right vehicle.

Its not about what anyone else thinks you should do. Your an American. An individual. Buy something that trully speaks to you. Buy something that has everything you want and need in a vehicle. Stay true, take care of it and you will be a happy owner. If you buy something you may not be entirly happy with simply because everyone else told you to then your not going to be as happy with your investment.

I try to treat my vehicle lile I treat a special women I like. Good luck
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
motobene
New Member Introduction
4
06-20-2017 01:27 PM
RoadWarrior
General Range Rover Discussion - Archived
6
02-01-2009 01:38 AM
Randall in NC
Discovery II
4
12-03-2005 10:55 AM
Off Topic
1
04-14-2005 08:15 PM



Quick Reply: Shopping for a D2 but should I go for a LR3?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:47 AM.